GOP Congressman: Global Warming Is A Total Fraud To Implement Global Government


In a previous article here on Freedom Outpost, Organizing for Action President Jon Carson was preparing to "call out" the climate change deniers during "Action August." With "Action August" now in swing, California Congressman Dana Rohrabacher announced in a town hall meeting that "global warming is a 'total fraud' designed to create a global government to 'control all of our lives.'"

Standing before the Newport Mesa Tea Party last week, Rohrabacher said, "Just so you know, global warming is a total fraud and it is being designed by – what you've got is you've got liberals who get elected at the local level want state government to do the work and let them make the decisions. Then, at the state level, they want the federal government to do it. And the federal government, they want to create global government to control all of our lives."

Rohrabacher added, "That's what the game plan is. It's step by step, more and bigger control over our lives by higher levels of government. And global warming is that strategy in spades...."

Talk about calling someone out. It looks like one climate change/global warming denier is doing a little calling out of his own.

According to the Daily Caller:

The Nation reports that Rohrabacher prefaced his remarks by saying he wanted to respond to California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer.

Boxer recently said that the "ongoing wildfires in Southern California have been exacerbated by a dry season that is the result of climate change," according to the Nation.

"Our freedom to make our choices on transportation and everything else? No, that's gotta be done by a government official who, by the way, probably comes from Nigeria because he's a UN government official, not a US government official," Rohrabacher said.

The Nation notes, "In the past, he's suggested that global warming has been caused by everything from dinosaur flatulence to rainforests."

Rohrabacher is one of several Republican congressmen to make headlines bashing global warming. Last week, Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King told a crowd that global warming was more "religion" than science.

Oklahoma Republican Markwayne Mullin told ThinkProgress that he did not believe in global warming.

"All of our records we've hit in heat waves, look at them. They're in the 1930s. Dust bowl happened way before your and I's time," Mullin said. "And the cycles we had, we had cold winters growing up and we've had mild winters growing up."

In his speech, Rohrabacher amused the crowd by relating an anecdote regarding an exchange between himself and California governor, Arnold Schwartzenegger. Whether it was Rohrbacher's close mimic of Schwartzenegger's voice or the fact that Schwartzenegger was embarrassed by Rohrbacher putting "global warming" supporter Schwartzenegger in his place is a toss up. Rohrbacher reminded the crowd of President Dwight D. Eisenhower's farewell address warning America about the coalition between scientists and the government.

Watch the video of Rohrbacher's speech.

Anyone searching the internet can find scientific data supporting global warming and scientific data refuting global warming. The data is conflicting which suggests global warming cannot be supported by the scientific method, used by all scientists, when proving or disproving a hypothesis; it provides a method for obtaining the same repeatable result by any scientist. The scientific data for global warming goes from one extreme to the other as all variables that intersect concerning the Earth are unknown so scientists use "best guess" to account for those.

Scientific predictions concerning global warming/climate change made in the the late 90s have not materialized leaving some scientists scratching their head, but still touting the global warming/climate change "if we don't do something, the sky will fall" rhetoric. Other scientists, whose data refutes global warming or cannot prove the theory, remain skeptical of global warming because of the unknown variables concerning the Earth.

It can be best compared to seeing two doctors. A patient, with a history of reflux disease, goes into the doctor complaining of chest pain and throat burning. A history of the symptoms is taken and the patient reports he has taken his reflux prevention medicine daily. The doctor, after completing an examination, tells the patient the current medication may not be working and prescribes a more expensive, newer drug. Following the doctor's instructions, the patient begins treatment but still suffers from chest pain and burning after 3 weeks. He see the doctor again, who maintains his stance and chances medication again. Another 3 weeks pass, the patient is no better. He sees another doctor who cannot figure out the problem, after a history and examination; but, he sends the patient to a specialist. The specialist discovers the problem and the patient is treated without further incident.

The analogy shows one doctor willing to spend the patient's money on one treatment after the other without knowing all the facts; while the other doctor, willing to admit not all variable may be known, sends the patient to someone who can find other variables.

While there is no "specialist" who can identify all the Earth's variables, global warming proponents are like the first doctor, willing to spend your money on "treatments" for a perceived problem that has not been proven. The climate change deniers are like the second doctor, unwilling to "treat" a "problem" without all the information.

But, the issue really isn't if there is global warming or not. The issue is the strategy of global warming – the establishment of government control over every aspect of our lives. The more people opting in or "buying" global warming theories leads to more people willing to give up freedoms and liberty for future security even if it is a false one. The government banks on people believing this country is a democracy (mob rule) instead of a constitutional republic respecting individual freedom and liberty. Getting enough of the "mob" to believe, in effect, to tip the scales away from the Constitution toward government control is the goal. With plenty of ignorant stupid Americans willing to sell their soul for entitlements and security and partake of the government Kool-aid, informed intelligent Americans are in for a fight, but at least, some in Congress are seeing what some have seen for years.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.


Print Friendly





Comments

comments

About Suzanne Hamner
Suzanne Hamner (pen name) is a registered nurse, grandmother of 4, and a political independent residing in the state of Georgia, who is trying to mobilize the Christian community in her area to stand up and speak out against tyrannical government, invasion by totalitarian political systems masquerading as religion and get back to the basics of education.
  • http://globe9.com

    Global Warming, Dirty Coal, Socialized health care, abortions for all,
    one percenters, NSA, EPA, FEMA, immigration reform, bla bla bla. They
    are all buzz words for a New World Order through the Bilderberg group
    based on communism.
    http://globe9.com

  • zagozana

    7,000,000,000 (billion) people and growing exponentially and
    you guys would rather believe that 97% of the climatologists are
    somehow all working together to push some sort of agenda.
    At the same time you trust the fossil fuel companies like
    Exxon/Mobil and BP and the coal industries to be telling
    the truth about everything. Why should they be trusted?
    The Iraqi War was created so those (Chainy) who would have the
    most to gain would gain the most!
    By the way, China just got 70% of the oil that "we" were fighting for.

    War: The Number One Source of Carbon (CO2)

    The U.S. military is the biggest producer of carbon on the planet.

    Harvey Wasserman notes that fighting wars more than wipes out any reduction in carbon from the government’s proposed climate measures.

    Writing in 2009 about the then-proposed escalation in the Afghanistan war, Wasserman said:

    The war would also come with a carbon burst. How will the
    massive emissions created by 100,000-plus soldiers in wartime be
    counted in the 17% reduction rubric? Will the HumVees be converted to
    hybrids? What is the carbon impact of Predator bombs that destroy Afghan
    families and villages?

    The continuance of fighting all over the Middle East and North
    Africa completely and thoroughly undermines the government’s claims
    that there is a global warming emergency and that reducing carbon output
    through cap and trade is needed to save the planet.

    I can’t take anything the government says about carbon footprints seriously until the government ends the unnecessary wars … all over the globe.

    So whatever you think of climate change, all people can agree that ending the wars is important.

    (War also destroys the economy.)

  • Lorraine E

    I'm so happy to learn that a congressman is telling the truth and that is global warming or now global change is a total fraud and is being used to further control the masses. The
    government liars say that they have shut down H.A.A.R.P., which has been used for well over 50 years to control weather. Yes they did shut down the small Alaskan H.A.A.R.P. which has been pictured on line; however, there is a massive H.A.A.R.P. facility in Alaska which covers an entire valley and probably it is still operational because it is used in conjunction with chemtrails (primarily aluminum, barium, and strontium) to control the weather. All developed countries have been involved in weather control for

  • Jack Parker

    Hey! It's no longer "global warming". It's "man-made global climate change". First, there is no objective evidence for any significant "global climate change" and second, if there was, there is not objective evidence that it is "man-made".

  • dagriz

    Glad to see mexifornicate has produced SOME people with any intelligence

  • pookieamos

    Clear back in the late 1970's , the far left connived to come up with something so big and so dangerous to the whole world that it would scare all the countries into one government . The scam was Global Warming and Maurice Strong was the father of this lie . It was after this that the creation of the ABC agencies were started ,starting with the EPA ! Amercans had better seriously WAKE UP because these radicals are determined to implement AGENDA 21 , here and around the world. We will be told where to live in population centers in Eco sized apartments. We will be told where we will work , no more good jobs. We will be told if we get medical care . We will not be allowed to have AC , private cars , private homes . We will be told if we can have a baby or family.they will control our food consumption . All of this is the name of SUSTAINABILITY ! What isn't considered by Strong and the far left loons will be eliminated , everything I listed is part of that goal !

  • zagozana

    Let's see, should I trust the deniers that include 3% of the climate scientist
    or the 97% who agree with the trend. Ice cores going back nearly 1,000,000 years show our effects on the atmosphere.

    CAN'T FAKE THAT!

    One thing that man kind has changed amongst all the others is our continuing destruction of our forests. 80% of the dry mass of a tree is composed of carbon derived from CO2. Without them there is no other life form that can help to balance our increasing creation of CO2.

    http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence

    http://climate.nasa.gov/system/content_pages/main_images/evidence_CO2.jpg

    Certain facts about Earth's climate are not in dispute:

    The heat-trapping nature of carbon dioxide and other gases was demonstrated in the mid-19th century

    .2 Their ability to affect the transfer of infrared energy through the
    atmosphere is the scientific basis of many instruments flown by NASA.
    Increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in
    response.

    Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical
    mountain glaciers show that the Earth’s climate responds to changes in
    solar output, in the Earth’s orbit, and in greenhouse gas levels. They
    also show that in the past, large changes in climate have happened very
    quickly, geologically-speaking: in tens of years, not in millions or
    even thousands.3

    The evidence for rapid climate change is compelling:

    Sea level rise

    Global sea level rose about 17
    centimeters (6.7 inches) in the last century. The rate in the last
    decade, however, is nearly double that of the last century.4

    Global temperature rise

    All three major global surface temperature reconstructions show that Earth has warmed since 1880.5
    Most of this warming has occurred since the 1970s, with the 20 warmest
    years having occurred since 1981 and with all 10 of the warmest years
    occurring in the past 12 years.6
    Even though the 2000s witnessed a solar output decline resulting in an
    unusually deep solar minimum in 2007-2009, surface temperatures continue
    to increase.7

    Warming oceans

    The oceans have absorbed much of
    this increased heat, with the top 700 meters (about 2,300 feet) of ocean
    showing warming of 0.302 degrees Fahrenheit since 1969.8

    Shrinking ice sheets

    The Greenland and Antarctic ice
    sheets have decreased in mass. Data from NASA's Gravity Recovery and
    Climate Experiment show Greenland lost 150 to 250 cubic kilometers (36
    to 60 cubic miles) of ice per year between 2002 and 2006, while
    Antarctica lost about 152 cubic kilometers (36 cubic miles) of ice
    between 2002 and 2005.

    Declining Arctic sea ice

    Both the extent and thickness of Arctic sea ice has declined rapidly over the last several decades.9

    Glacial retreat

    Glaciers are retreating almost
    everywhere around the world — including in the Alps, Himalayas, Andes,
    Rockies, Alaska and Africa.10

    Extreme events

    The number of record high temperature events in the United States has been increasing, while the number of record low temperature events has been decreasing, since 1950.The U.S. has also witnessed increasing numbers of intense rainfall
    events.11

    Ocean acidification

    Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the acidity of surface ocean waters has increased by about 30 percent.12,13
    This increase is the result of humans emitting more carbon dioxide into
    the atmosphere and hence more being absorbed into the oceans. The
    amount of carbon dioxide absorbed by the upper layer of the oceans is
    increasing by about 2 billion tons per year.14,

    • NextToGone

      No one is denying that climate changes. It's an on going natural affect that we can't change. And it has been going on through out the planets history. Human intervention does greater harm than it does good. While we ALL know that we have to do our part in easing the pains for our planet, we also know that everything on this planet either adapts to the changes or moves to more suitable habitats and eventually returning when it needs to. The bottom line is that donating to a "cause" isn't going to change what is naturally going to happen no matter what we do.

      The other thing that you all fail to mention is that the Earth changes poles. "I'm not a scientist or anything so bear with me..." Everyone knows that the North and South Poles are OPEN magnetic poles. So you all always fail to mention that every spot in our atmosphere that has an open pole creates an opening in our ozone which creates a vacuum from the north to the south and back in to the north and so forth which is our magnetic field or, if you will, our doughnut shaped ozone layer. Our planet has been in the process of switching poles for the last, what, 50 years or so. Which means that there are multitudes of north and south poles mixed through out its core and creating even more holes in our ozone layer which creates global warming and cooling in locations that it shouldn't be. Meanwhile, melting icebergs, causing ocean life to move around to adjust and essentially Antarctica's land mass may even become visible again as in the ancient map that was discovered of Antarctica with no ice. This has been the reason for the growing amounts of skin cancer as well. How ever, politicians wanted us to believe that all of these "NEW" holes in our ozone layer was from hairspray, pollution and you name it.

      A lot is going to happen until it completes its course. But as scary as it seems, it is the planets natural course for regeneration as well as all of the storms that take place to water the land and to recharge it's core.

      Now I ask you... How in the hell is our money going to stop this from happening and guarentee our survival as a species on this planet?

    • zagozana

      You are not a scientist, obviously...
      "Human intervention does greater harm than it does good."????
      So the planting of new forests to replace the ones we have destroyed is a good idea? How is clear cutting natural?
      https://www.google.com/search?q=clear+cutting&safe=off&client=firefox-a&hs=2jI&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=f5ELUraOLur7yAGf44DoDA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1600&bih=744

      We are destroying the Earth in a way that is only comparable to what the asteroid that hit the Earth 65,000,000 yrs. ago.

      The ozone hole, as you can see in these images, is over the south pole, not like you say it is.

      "How in the hell is our money going to stop this from happening and guarantee our survival as a species on this planet?"

      WE COULD START PLANTING TREES AND STOP BURNING UP THE PLANETS RESOURCES! We could make birth control more available to the poorest people and feed the rest of them. We could stop wasting our money on more and more wars, don'cha know...

    • NextToGone

      Replanting trees IS doing our part in easing the pain. I own my own home and I am planting trees while using my bath water to help keep them watered during the last three years of drought while not killing the bugs so that I can get them all to come back and that takes years. I also keep the wild birds stocked with seeds and have built two water features on my land to help them keep cool when they want to. It keeps birds on my drought stricken land to help with unwanted bugs. That is not the human intervention that I am talking about and I didn't have to donate to a charity to do so. I'm also putting out Hummingbird feeders and helping the Hummingbirds without having to donate to "SAVE THE HUMMINGBIRDS". I'm talking about physically changing temperatures in the oceans to bring back fish that left the area to survive and should not be brought back till the tides have changed on their own to bring them back which would then ensure their survival in the area. Fish move, you can't stop that and you can't tell them where to live either.

      http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/23/federal-wildlife-officials-plan-to-send-hunters-to-kill-barred-owls-in/

      I'm talking about the killing of Barred Owls to bring back the Spotted Owls in California. Number one, owls are needed to help kill snakes, mice and rats no matter what kind they are. Number two, the Spotted Owls probably moved due to better survival odds. They'll return when they feel they can survive there. Birds move, you can't stop that and you can't tell them where to live either.

      There IS also a hole at the North Pole and every open magnetic pole in the Earths core. North sucks in and South pushes out. You can't have only one open pole.

      http://science1.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/

      Birth control IS more available to the poor people. And even to our children. We need to stop paying them to have babies and limit welfare benefits. As for waisting our money on more and more wars..... Preach that one to all of the worldly powers that WANT war and NOT to the little guys working their butts off just to put food on their OWN tables.

      And as per your FIRST sentence. Intelligence doesn't come from listening to what others say. It comes from exploring with open eyes and learning it on your own. I don't have to be a scientist to be intelligent.

    • pookieamos

      My dear friend look into their GeoEngineering program thats been being implemented for over 20 years , it is a major contributor to climate change and something else you need to know. The left doesn't really care about mother earth , else they wouldn't be poisoning the rivers, the oceans , the trees, killing the bees , killing people with their GeoEngineering ! There is very strong evidence they are furthering the destruction of the ozone with the massive amounts of nano particles of Aluminum , Barium and other metals , sprayed into the sky's on a daily basis in nearly every country of the world ! GW is a plan to CONTROL and DEPOPULATE !

    • zagozana

      POOKIEMAN...

      THE LEFT IS DESTROYING THE FORESTS, SCRAPING THE TOPS OFF OF MOUNTAINS FOR COAL IN THE SOUTHEASTERN STATES, STRIP MINING SOUTH WESTERN STATES AND DUMPING WASTES IN THE RIVERS?

      So the mega-corporations like Exxon/Mobil and BP are really the good guys and Green Peace is the enemy? Why would Green Peace want to kill trees and bees, rivers?
      -----Clear cutting is BIG BUSINESS!
      https://www.google.com/search?q=clear+cutting&safe=off&client=firefox-a&hs=IHd&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=jI8LUrbfI4_YyQGy2YHwDA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1600&bih=744

      The crap you bring out about the ozone hole is just that, crap.
      It actually is shrinking because we have cut back on their use...
      CFCs, cloro-floro-carbons used as propellents and coolants destroys it. ----VERY STRONG EVIDENCE!
      http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=xn9Ny3E14gIZgM&tbnid=h7Qf-qSbGRskzM:&ved=0CAUQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fglobalwarmingwatch.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F11%2Fshrinking-ozone-hole-heralds-success-of.html&ei=gY0LUsznMbai4AOqsoGQCQ&bvm=bv.50723672,d.aWc&psig=AFQjCNFSo00PuCOee44wO5B6sxp6Dh1m5A&ust=1376575033658109

      Would those like the uber-wealthy want to get rid of the populations be more likely then those without such resources? They want everything for themselves, right? That is what absolute greed leads to...

      Do you know that coal is slightly radioactive and its been used for millennia?
      China from space....
      https://www.google.com/search?q=china+pollution+from+space&safe=off&client=firefox-a&hs=vXI&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=kI4LUujuOsjcyQGJ1YDQBw&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1600&bih=744

    • zagozana

      Oh, by the way, the ozone layer is 300,000 ft. up and the "chem-trails" that you speak of are at maybe 35,000 ft. dust does not climb up, it falls down. Only gasses like the CFC's that we find destroying the ozone layer can climb up...

      "The left doesn't really care about mother earth , else they wouldn't be
      poisoning the rivers, the oceans , the trees, killing the bees , killing
      people..."

      Since the right is driven more by greed, 40 families own most of the American economy, like the oil companies, the mine industry, the nuclear industry, the logging industries, the pharmaceutical , industries, and especially the military/industrial complex, your silly blithering about us wanting to kill the trees, the bees, the whales, and the people seem profoundly ludicrous...

      Oh, ya... We are the ones who defund health care for the babies and their mothers, too... Right....

  • Eric Haulenbeek

    Most people have come to the realization that the whole idea of this global warming scheme was political. You'd have to be a complete idiot to think it was anything but, and yet we still have these political hacks who think their constant cries of wolf are somehow going to change minds. They're total frauds... every one of them. They just don't realize how stupid they sound when they're harping this nonsense!

  • John Patriot

    Global Warming, Dirty Coal, Socialized health care, abortions for all, one percenters, NSA, EPA, FEMA, immigration reform, bla bla bla. They are all buzz words for a New World Order through the Bilderberg group based on communism.

  • freedomringsforall

    Yep

    An absolute twisted demonic plan to enslave every single carbon filled human being on the face of the earth except of course those elitist in the loop to reap the benefits of the plan.

    Our country and this world are spinning into insanity on purpose.

    The Internationalist have their plan, the Islamists have their plan, and the
    commie/socialists have their plan.

    For the moment they all align with intent so they are all using each other to create absolute worldwide chaos and each leader propped up by these groups is out for what they want and obama is good at that game.

    The purpose for chaos and death is to justify clamp down, arms confiscation, and in general steps toward dictatorial powers for these groups.

    These groups just like the axis powers in World War 2 will work together on a worldwide basis to make these realities come to fruition.

    Just as the axis powers in world war two believed that they could rule the
    world in sync after dominating it they each all also secretly believed that
    they could overcome the other in the end and become the one true leader of the entire world, so do these new axis powers believe the same.

    I believe the internationalists believe as Hitler did that with an overwhelming political power, economic power, and military power of a united Europe and the Americas in their pocket and with deep inroads (politically and economically) into the African continent and the mid asia, and asia proper continents that they will eventually come out on top as the unified world leaders and thus enforce the one world governance that they have been developing onto the world.

    We are one step away from a total worldwide dictatorship.

    The 2nd amendment.

    If we do not ensure that our 2nd amendment rights and freedoms are rock solid then no rights will be and if we lose the U.S. we lose the world.

    And that my friends is what all of them are counting on.

  • Raymond Michael Borland

    Thank you Dana Rohrbacher. In the late 1970s a consensus of world scientists said a new Ice Age was starting. They were wrong . Professor Michael Mann generated a hockey stick graph that showed atmospheric temperatures increasing exponentially in the 1990s, claimed the decade of the 1990s was the hottest on record and that 1998 was the hottest year of the decade. Two Canadian statisticians finally accessed Mann's database and showed no significant change in atmospheric temperature, and no extremes for the decade or the year 1998. Despite a 25% increase in atmospheric CO2 since 2000 or so, there has not been any significant warming of the atmosphere over and above the slight warming trend that started around 1850 when the mini Ice Age ended. These Canadian statisticians and Dr. Edward Wegman, a world famous statistician, showed that random numbers used as data produced a hockey stick curve using Mann's bogus statistical modeling methods. Climatologists had to back track and they wanted to fool the people with a slight of hand trick. they no longer referred to man made global warming due to CO2 emissions but now talk about climate change causing all sorts of dooms day events, even causing increases in violent crime rate. All these reports are based on bad computer modeling and massive speculation. despite not having significant atmospheric warming occurring for the past 20 years, the articles still say ," if climate change continues through the year 2050 or 2100, then such and such doomsday event will happen." It is all bad science or put more bluntly it is garbage in, garbage out by climatologists who are playing with their computer models rather than actually observing the real world. Now they are claiming warming of the atmosphere would be seen if cooling that started 200 years ago at the end of the mini Ice Age did not mask it. Yeh. So why wasn't the cooling dominant in most of that time before human started producing as much CO2? This theory by the way is untestable and unprovable. It is equally valid using Occam Razor to just conclude 400 ppm CO2 in the atmosphere is far too small to cause global atmospheric warming. The world wide consensus of scientists has already been wrong twice.

    They get their funding by singing the same tune. Global warming skeptics get fired from universities, and do not get research grants. Often they can't even get their non-consensus papers published. The game is rigged. In the middle ages there was a consensus in all of Europe and in the Catholic Church that the earth was flat and the sun revolved around the earth. One man, Galileo, disagreed. The Church would have burned him at the stake but they asked him to shut up forever and imprisoned him for the rest of his life. Fact finally could no be denied and Galileo was proven correct. All I ask climatologists is to allow a true debate with studies that conflict the majority opinion and let the truth finally be settled by facts. Computer model generated scenarios are not facts. We don't even know all the factors that affect climate and we do know weather is a non-linear phenomenon ruled by chaos theory (see Gleich's book entitled Chaos). It may never be possible predict all the climate changes .

    here are some of the hoaxes perpetrated by the consensus of scientists: There is NO proof hurricane frequency or severity is related to manmade global warming. They say there is. There is no evidence tornado frequency or severity is related to GW. They speculate worst tornado will occur when the world warms up. Polar bears are not going extinct. in fact there are more polar bears now than there were 150 years ago. Sea levels are not rising. if they were over the past 30 years do you think the pacific atolls which were at sea level would still not be submerged? Droughts and heavy rainfalls and flooding seen in the USA in recent years have all happened at this level in the past before the increase in atmospheric CO2. And , for Pete sake, violent crime rates are not caused by climate change. The highest crime rates are in black inner city populations in places like Chicago, Detroit, Washington, D.C. I guess this means whites dominant cities are less affected by climate change because the violent crimes rates in them is 1/10th the rate in predominantly black cities.

    ctiies

  • TAM44

    Yes global warming is a fraud like that illegal lying POS obama and that's 100% truth.

  • NextToGone

    It's called HAARP.

    http://www.chronicle.su/news/snowden-reveals-haarps-global-assassination-agenda/

    It's the perfect weapon to create droughts, cause sink holes, mud slides, avalanches, tsunamis and you name it. Obamanature