U.S. Moves One Step Closer To Civil War – SCOTUS Strikes Down DOMA


In a victory for sexual perverts in States where it is legal for deviants to be "married," the Supreme Court of the United States has spit in the face of Almighty God and every true Christian in this country, and ignored thousands of years of human history in which homosexual acts have been tolerated by some, but never have they allowed to "marry" on a de facto or de jure basis, by striking down the provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act that deny sexual deviants the same Federal benefits of marriage.

The Court reasoned that it is unconstitutional to deny marriage benefits to some married couples but allow them for others. On a strictly legal platform, this is not surprising, and frankly was expected. In effect, they are leaving it to the States to decide. States that do not recognize pervert "marriages" still are not required to do so, and do not have to provide State benefits to same-sex couples, nor recognize same-sex "marriages" of couples who move to their States, but were "married" in one that permits it, but are merely saying that the Federal government may not give to one group what it does not give to another.

The error in this reasoning is that homosexuals are not a federally recognized protected class, yet the majority court seems to have ignored this axiom. The really disturbing part of this ruling on DOMA is that it opens the door for States to permit incestuous, polygamous, and incestuous polygamous marriages; equal rights for all means all, right? It appears that the Court did not think this through to its logical conclusion.

In regards to Proposition 8, the victory is far less celebratory for the perverts, and contrary to the spin being put on it by the media, there is not really a victory here on the merits of the case. Rather, the case was dismissed for being improperly before the Court. The majority ruled that private citizens do not have standing to argue before the Supreme Court a defense of a law, duly enacted by the voters of that State, which the State Government has then refused to defend. Yet the voters in California overwhelmingly voted to dis-allow same sex marriage, and with this ruling, the Court is giving the green light for State Governments to ignore the will of the people in a legal vote – this should send a chill down every Americans spine, and brings us one step closer to the loss of the democratic process in America; your vote now no longer means anything, and the State government can now choose to override a lawful vote by the people, in favor of its own agenda, so why have the voting process at all? The power of the vote of the citizenry has now, not been whittled away, it has been hacked apart by an axe.

It cannot be stated enough that the Court did NOT strike down Prop 8. The opinion of the Court has not yet been published at Cornell, and so it is difficult to comment intelligently on the ruling, however several issues seem to remain unaddressed, for example what about States that do not permit same-sex "marriages" but allow civil unions? Strictly speaking, same-sex unions were not before the Court, and are therefore not covered by this ruling.

The specific language of the Court in this issue will hinge on whether they remanded the case back to the Ninth Circuit, or whether they affirmed the ruling of the Ninth Circuit in striking down Prop 8; if remanded it means it has been sent back to the Ninth Circuit for retrial and reconsideration, if affirmed, there can be no further legal challenges IN CALIFORNIA unless the issue is properly returned to the SCOTUS by persons “with standing”. The MSM is reporting that they remanded it, which means all the cheering about it is somewhat premature. It should also be noted that in refusing to hear the case, the Ninth Circuit's ruling applies only to California, and the other 39 States with prohibitions against perverts "marrying" are in no way affected.

The Court, in skirting the primary issue, is there a constitutional right to ‘buggar’ or ‘scissor’ another human being and get "married" for it, has merely put off the inevitable. Sooner or later they must rule on the constitutionality of same-sex "marriage." Being that the Constitution does not mention marriage at all, the logical person does not see how this could be held that homosexuals have a right to "marry." The Tenth Amendment is clear, those powers not enumerated in the Constitution, like the regulation of marriage, belong to the States. It seems the Court is inviting a challenge by the States of the Constitutionality of the right to pervert "marriage," so the matter can be settled once and for all.

Do not despair and believe that because, on a technical point of law in striking down DOMA, that the Court will affirm a Constitutional right to homosexual "marriage," and in refusing to hear Prop 8, they are merely saying it was improperly before they court – the merits of the Prop 8 case were not reached nor discussed.

In light of the recent scandals of this Administration and the continued propensity of the Government to move toward a Totalitarian State by whittling away at our most basic rights, like the right to keep and bear arms without interference, amnesty for criminals invading our country and draining our economy, the destruction of our financial base and standing in the world through un-controlled spending, the NSA and IRS blatant violations of our most basic rights, the staged ‘shooting tragedies” like Aurora and Sandy Hook, the Boston bombings, the infiltration of the Administration by the Muslim Brotherhood and the governments embracing of Islam, and the horrific murder of the unborn, the U.S. with this ruling has moved one step closer to Civil War, a probability that has been simmering for quite a while now; A move to confiscate weapons will certainly precipitate it, as will an economic meltdown or continued federal abuses and power grabs. I believe we are at the 'damp fuse point'....let the fuse dry a bit more and the existing sparks will be enough to set it off - increase the sparks or intensity, and waiting will not be required.

Arm yourselves, as the prospect of Civil War has now increased more than ever. Another tenderbox is fixing to be added to the mix, the Trayvon Martin shooting. Should Zimmerman go free, racist blacks have said in every venue I have seen, that they will riot and kill the whitey – such a comment was even posted to one of my more recent articles on that subject at Freedom Outpost and on Facebook, read it here.

If the racist blacks do riot, every citizen has the right to defend themselves with lethal force. The police will be overwhelmed and will not be able to protect you, you must be prepared to protect yourself and your family, and not shirk at the necessity of shooting down rioting animals in the streets. Obamler will likely use the rioting, or threats of such, as an excuse to declare martial law, and this could very well be the second shot heard ‘round the world’.

The America that our Founding Fathers fought and bled for is now gone my friends. It is high time to do something about it. When you get to Heaven and stand before Almighty God, and you are asked to account for all your deeds, or lack of them, and The Lord asks you, “why did you stand by and allow my children in the womb to be murdered in the most horrific ways, WHY did you allow perverts that I have deemed an abomination to over run the country I gave you, WHY did you sit in your home at your computer bellyaching about these things but did nothing…”, WHAT WILL YOU SAY?

Best think about that a bit.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

Print Friendly





Comments

comments

About Shea Bernard
Shea Bernard; BSEE, MCSE, MCITP, CCIE, IT Consultant, with 30 yrs in the IT industry. He is currently pursuing graduate degrees in History, and is completing an undergraduate in Religious Studies, and hopes to begin an undergraduate in Astrophysics and Geology upon completion of graduate courses. Mr. Bernard is married with two children, owns and runs two businesses. Follow Shea Bernard on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SheaBernard
  • pearler

    Follow the yellow brick road;).

  • braniff1

    if this person is illegal he only needs to take our weapons and tell us to fourselves...how will we communicate around the country when this illegal person starts trying to round up gun owners....can someone tell me what the plan is protect our weapons and does anyone think the police will follow order from the higher ups to take our weapons or try..i would like to think the police officers who most formerly military would tell the up highs to kiss their royal red rosey

  • braniff1

    will someone explain to me if this person birth certificate is a fraud, how much do we have to suffer at the hands of a gd criminal that is hell bent on destroying america...his own attorney says the bc is a gd fraud....what does the house need to do to impeach this sob...to protect myself from the criminals in washington i want to define some of the two letter symbols.....gd...is gosh darn a term from watching too much andy....sob is a term used to define son of buck

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Hikaru-Sulu/100000265531432 Hikaru Sulu

    I want states rights. But there are so many precedences in law that go against that foundamental idea. I think our founders said something about our democracy only working if we're moral. I'm growning increasingly annoyed at the gay activism sideshow. I like gay people, they're comic relief and a good example to children of what not to be. Some poeples purpose on this planet is to an example to others.

  • john4637

    Hold tight to the 2nd amendment they are coming for our guns and our Lord!!

  • Guest

    Here is the pervert Heather Ferris' facebook page - go at it.

    https://www.facebook.com/FerrisAgain?fref=ts

    • WillardGibbs

      shea: If electricity were electricity, you would be a power station.

  • Buster

    Wow. 996 comments at last count! And so many with such vitriol! You can really feel the Love Thy Neighbor vibe in here. Way to go!

    • Judicious

      Yes, heartwarming…! Love Big Brother ‘Bama; love infanticide; love IRS oppression; love NSA spying on citizens; love taxpayer rip-offs; love arming drug dealers; love the nuptials of prurient perversion; love jihad; love moral decay right from the very top; love demolished hope, and change for the worse, with the demon demagogue paving the path to misery. And hordes of “Thy Brainwashed Neighbors” voted for it! Way to go…

    • Buster

      Please. I have zero love for the President nor his administration. What I do think I see is that folk -- men, women -- should be granted equal rights and protections under the law. Simply stated, that's where I'm coming from. Looking at American history, if we went by the popular vote, would slavery have been ended? Women's suffrage? School desegregation?

      Or are these all signs of perversion and embrace of jihad?

      A mullah is a mullah, whether he's Islamic or Christian. Not remembering could make you appear quite the d-bag.

    • Judicious

      The problem is the clueless American voters, awash in a sea of moral decay, and becoming devoid of basic civil values, devoid of gracious manners, and devoid of simple humanity. The “dumbing-down” of America has taken a firm hold. Obama cultivates and exploits this situation to advance his insidious agenda

      How about the democrat mullah…? Let’s see… we have:

      · KKK, democrats in masks
      · Unions, “We know where you live.”
      · Obama, “They bring knives, we’ll bring guns.”
      · Abortionists, running the Gosnell ghoul factories
      · Jihadists, engaging in Obama’s workplace violence.
      · Holder, “Get those news folks.”
      · Occupy movement, public bowel movement
      · IRS, “Get those conservatives.”
      · Obama’s military, chaplains threatened with court-martial
      · Obama’s military, religious soldiers threatened with court martial
      · Holder, excuse polling place intimidation
      · Riots, “Dem libs will be dem libs… play nice now.”
      · Benghazi, murder by a video clip nobody saw
      · Benghazi, neither HRC nor BHO answered the 3 AM call
      · Obama, $billions and F-16s to our enemies
      · Obama’s dems, assault on personal and religious freedom
      · Holder, walking guns to drug dealing murderers.

      Whom do these trolls love?

    • shea

      Homosexuals already have the exact same rights as everyone else....

  • KentPerry

    Impressive list of accomplishments Mr Bernard

  • Dan

    Poppy Cock.. ? I don't think so . Read. 1st John 3:15

  • Eagle2758

    NEWS & VIEWS TWISTED
    Father & Daughter Charged With Incest After Affair -- But Should They Be?
    Posted by Kiri Blakeley on June 27, 2013 at 10:16 AM

    http://www.cafemom.com/articles/in_the_news/157622/father_daughter_charged_with_incest?utm_medium=sem2&utm_campaign=prism&utm_source=outbrain&utm_content=0

  • Eagle2758

    One of the big NAMBLA supporters thinks child slavery is normal! -
    Samuel R. Delany, professor and author. In extended interviews about his novel Hogg in 2004 he stated he supported a group like NAMBLA because "abuse is fostered by the secrecy itself and lack of social policing". He expounded that "for thousands of years, relations we assume are abusive by definition (child marriages, slavery, child labor, etc.) were the social and legal norm, institutional and ubiquitous [..] behavior that we [today] find wholly unacceptable—flogging slaves, wife beating, and child beating (in the family, in the school, and at the factory)—was recommended by experts and clergymen as the most efficient and least disruptive way to maintain [social] order. All of these institutions changed, nevertheless, only when they were no longer economically feasible or beneficial to the greater society.[34]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association

  • Eagle2758

    NAMBLA<<<< Purpose of NAMBLA

    NAMBLA is perceived as a front for the criminal sexual exploitation of children, functioning as a meeting place for male pedophiles and pederasts and their sympathizers.
    Onell R. Soto, a San Diego Union-Tribune writer, wrote in February 2005: "Law enforcement officials and mental health professionals say that while NAMBLA's membership numbers are small, the group has a dangerous ripple effect through the Internet by sanctioning the behavior of those who would abuse children."[4]
    NAMBLA rejects the widely held view that sex between adults and minors is always harmful, arguing that "the outcomes of personal experiences between adults and younger people primarily depend upon whether their relationships were consensual."[10]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association

  • Eagle2758

    All you deviants,queers,and Militant Homofacists - touch my kid, guess what? YOU have been warned.

    NAMBLA - " The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a pedophile and pederasty advocacy organization in the United States that works toabolish age of consent laws criminalizing adult sexual involvement with minors,[2][3] and for the release of all men who have been jailed for sexual contacts with minors that did not involve coercion.[2][4] Some reports state that the group no longer has regular national meetings, and that as of the late 1990s, to avoid local police infiltration, the organization discouraged the formation of local chapters.[4][5] Around 1995, an undercover detective discovered that there were 1,100 people on the rolls.[4] As of 2005, a newspaper report stated that NAMBLA was based in New York and San Francisco, and held an annual gathering in New York City and monthly meetings around the country.[4]

    NAMBLA has been defended by poet and rights advocate Allen Ginsberg[6][7] and gay rights activist Harry Hay.[8]

    Goals and positions

    NAMBLA's website states that it is a political, civil rights, and educational organization whose goal is to end "the extreme oppression of men and boys in mutually consensual relationships."[9]According to the NAMBLA, some of the organization's primary positions are:

    Supporting and promoting man/boy relationships: they hold that when consensual these relationships are not harmful or child sexual abuse.[10] One study they cite is the controversial Rind et al. paper.[11]

    Age-of-consent reform: what NAMBLA describes as "empowerment of youth in all areas, not just the sexual."[9]

    History

    Events such as Anita Bryant's "Save Our Children" campaign in 1977, and a police raid of Toronto-area gay newspaper The Body Politic for publishing "Men Loving Boys Loving Men" set the stage for the founding of NAMBLA.[5]

    In December 1977, police raided a house in the Boston suburb of Revere. Twenty-four men were arrested and indicted on over 100 felony counts of the statutory rape of boys aged eight to fifteen. Suffolk County District Attorney Garrett Byrne found that the men used drugs and video games to lure the boys into a house, where they photographed them as they engaged in sexual activity. The men were members of a "sex ring", and said that the arrest was only "the tip of the iceberg."[5] The arrests sparked intense media coverage, and local newspapers published the photographs and personal information of the accused men. The "Boston-Boise Committee", a gay rights organization, formed in response to these events and to protect the "rights of gay men" and promote "gay solidarity." NAMBLA's founding was inspired by this gay rights organization.[14] It was co-founded by the gay historian David Thorstad.[15]

    In 1982 a NAMBLA member was falsely linked to the disappearance of Etan Patz. Although the accusation was groundless, the negative publicity was disastrous to the organization.[16] NAMBLA published a book documenting the events, A Witchhunt Foiled: The FBI vs. NAMBLA.[17]

    In testimony before the United States Senate, NAMBLA was exonerated from any criminal activities and it concluded "It is the pedophile with no organized affiliations who is the real threat to children,"[18]

    Mike Echols, the author of I Know My First Name is Steven, infiltrated NAMBLA and his observations are recorded in his book, published in 1991. At one point he published the names, addresses and phone numbers of 80 suspected NAMBLA members on his website, which lead to death threats towards people who were not members.[5]

    In 1994 NAMBLA was expelled from the International Lesbian and Gay Association, having been the first US based organization to be a member.[15] Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys was produced and directed by Adi Sideman in 1994. Members of NAMBLA were interviewed and presented defenses of the organization. Allen Ginsberg appeared in the film.[19]

    In 2000, Robert and Barbara Curley sued NAMBLA for the wrongful death of their son. A NAMBLA founder speculated that the case would "break our backs, even if we win, which we will."[5] The suit was eventually dismissed. Media reports from 2006 have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts.[20] (Yeah... right.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association

  • Eagle2758

    Churches will soon have to marry pedophiles, bestiality deviants,etc. and their pets. Save your sheep, cats dogs, horses, pigs, cows, llamas, etc.

  • arcee15425

    all I can say is they always taught me - judge not lest ye be judged yourself and God is the only one that can judge our actions - maybe you would do good to remember your whole faith and not just the part that is convenient in the moment

  • Billy Right

    For one Marriage originated from religion, and it clearly stated
    marriage was between a male and female only. If it wasn't for the
    straight Christians and other religions you wouldn't even be arguing
    about gays and lesbians getting married, because there would be no such
    thing. To second that the government shouldn't even have anything to do
    with marriage, they need to just leave it to the churches and screw the
    gays, try finding a church to marry u sickos then. If you sickos wanna
    get married so bad do it your damn selves, Marriage is between a man and
    a women, period as it is stated originally.