The debate on homosexual "marriage" and ‘rights’ continues full steam. Those of us who are opposed to this are pejoratively labeled as “haters”, “bigots” and a plethora of other vile names, all while they, homosexuals, preach of love and tolerance to opposing viewpoints. They attack Facebook pages which support homosexual "marriage," doing so with the expressed purpose of bringing the page down and silencing all dissenting votes. They are immune to logic and facts, attempting to rationalize their behavior through whatever manner they can, claiming animals do it ( one of the most ridiculous excuses I have ever heard ), that it is natural ( an is/ought fallacy), and most importantly ( and falsely ), that they were born that way, a formal fallacy of deductive reasoning as the premise is unfounded and unproven. They claim that they do not have the same rights as the rest of us, and that they are the objects of ridicule, teasing, name calling, and discrimination, while at the same time having no ethical compunction about doing it themselves.
These people don’t even want to get married, they just want the benefits of marriage. Marriage is about the complimentary union of a man and a woman - the way Almighty God ( or Nature depending on your cosmological view ) intended it; perfect symmetry of form & function, and in perfect complimentarianism. Let us examine some of these claims today, and in the interests of brevity, the others in follow-up articles.
“I was born that way”
Rubbish. Not only does this fly in the face of common sense, it is at odds with evolutionary genetics, Medellin genetics, endocrinology, bio-chemistry, and the most recent nucleotide studies. It is also at odds with the design of the Creator. How so, you ask? Well lets go through an overview of gamete life forms ( sexually reproducing life forms ). All higher-order gamete life on this planet reproduces through gamete biology – through heterosexual congress, the form of which we are all familiar.
The Prime genetic program, reproduction and the propagation of the species, is strictly dependent upon this mechanism, which is an irreducibly complex system. In order for this mechanism to function, it is necessary that the bio-chemistry of the life form direct the male and female of the species to be ‘attracted’ to one another, lest intercourse would never happen. This mechanism is dormant until puberty; the activation mechanism is a genetic "switch" ( epi-genetics), specifically the GPR-54 gene. This gene is activated by a molecular peptide called 'kisspeptin', which is in turn produced by another gene called the kiSS-1 [gene]. When the GPR-54 gene is activated, the endocrine system kicks in producing a wide variety of hormones, resulting in the heretofore dormant 'sexual feelings' to emerge.
At this point the subject begins to 'feel' his/her sexuality, both physical and emotional. It is at the onset of puberty that boys lose interest in their male friends, and suddenly find females attractive - girls start to see boys in a different light ( due to the production of the hormone oxytocin in the female ), a whole plethora of physical, emotional and endocrine changes occurs; everyone should have learned this in high school biology. Thousands upon thousands of books have been written to explain these changes to new pubescent children, to help them understand the physical and emotional changes that they are going through. This is a well settled subject and is not open for debate.
So what does this mean? It means that no one is born anything but heterosexual, unless they are claiming chromosomal damage ( not likely, genetic flaws are corrected by various evolutionary mechanism’s and if this is the case, genetics would have countered the flaw within a few generations [this is simple Mendelian Genetics ]), and homosexuals would have died out within a few generations of the first appearance of the wayward genetics or chromosomal damage. Accepting this, it then follows that everyone is born heterosexual.
You can read more about it at NIMH.
So bearing in mind that the reproduction subroutine absolutely requires that the male and female be attracted to each other for the prime program to operate, it logically follows that we are all born the same way. There is no life on this planet that reproduces through same sex congress, so what would be the point of humans or animals being ‘born’ that way, unless it is a defect? We may then observe that there, then, isn’t really any such thing as homosexuality, just homosexual BEHAVIOR; heterosexual humans pleasuring themselves in whatever manner suits them. Homosexuals might also observe that they are born with heterosexual parts – if you have a penis or a vagina you are a heterosexual life form. Just because you discover that you CAN do something else with your penis, does not mean you’re not a heterosexual. Humans are not flying animals either, but we have learned to be – doesn’t mean those humans who fly get to call themselves birds.
Dr. Francis S. Collins, head of the Human Genome Project, along with his team of over 150 of the top geneticists in the world, who sequenced and decoded the human genome, three years ahead of schedule, have emphatically said, ad nauseam, that there is NO gay gene, and although I have the original report from Collins where he DID say this in a press conference, this has now been sanitized by the truth loving tolerant homosexuals and the MSM; but you can read excerpts still, like at NARTH; read it here.
The American College of Pediatrics also maintains this position, read it here. I am awaiting permission and further clarification if I am allowed to publish Collins original words which I obtained from an academic journal on JSTOR. These publications, as with all scientific or peer-reviewed publications and the intellectual property of the author and as such are usually not available to the public and cannot be accessed on the Internet without paid subscriptions, and even then only for one’s own research).
Unlike disreputable homosexual scientists like LeVay, a scientist AND homosexual who had a preconceived notion of whether homosexuality was genetic or not and was simply trying to support his opinions with research that was exceedingly personal to him ( he was gay), The Human Genome scientists conducted original unbiased research; the Human Genome Project had no such ulterior motives nor preconceptions, and went about their project with the intent to simply map and sequence the human genome – they were not out to prove anything one way or another on ANY subject. But once done, it was quite evident that there was no gay gene. It should be noted that without fail, EVERY study done by homosexual advocate ‘scientists’ has been debunked, and none, absolutely NONE have EVER been reproduced. The latter means the research was garbage, whether it’s about homosexuality or baking a pie. The mis-use of control groups by homo activists is a prime target as well.
Additionally, research into this question that is performed by homosexual advocates is unsound and not credible, for reasons that should not require belaboring. A liberal would not believe the National Right to Life’s research on the issue of abortion, or accept an Latter Day Saints researcher’s research on whether Kolob exists or not, but they will happily accept the same type of biased research from the LGBT and their pseudo-science minions when it supports their pet causes. That is not to say that a homosexual scientist is not credible – if a homo is researching the existence of magnetic mono-poles in N-Desitter space as support for String Theory, then their sexual orientation is not relevant to that research and that research is credible. But when a homo scientist researches his OWN issues, THAT research is garbage. This should not have to be explained as to why.
None the less, they insist that they were born that way, and bemoan how they are teased, laughed at and ridiculed; these people seem to think that they have a corner on Hell, that their particular brand of persecution is worse than the next mans, and that no one who is not a homo could understand their plight. Ignoring the half dozen logical fallacies in such a position, kids and adults are teased every day for many reasons, homosexuality being the least. Girls are teased about body style, small breasts, not being pretty, boys are teased and bullied by the bigger boys, the 'geeks', the intellectuals on the physics team or the chess club, are looked down on and reviled by the 'jocks' and cheerleaders, a boy who plays the piano is teased, a girl who likes sports is shunned by other 'girly' girls, poor kids are picked on mercilessly. They are NOT unique in this regard and the claim ( spoken or de-facto ) that they are is at best disingenuous, but in any case belies youth and inexperience.
Additionally, if my lifestyle, caused me to be persecuted and bullied to the point that I wanted to kill myself, well call me silly but I would waste no time in changing my lifestyle, instead of trying to change everyone else’s reaction to it.
Also, and perhaps most importantly, if a homosexual, or anyone, would consider killing themselves over a WORD or teasing, I would suggest that such a person has more wrong with them than their sexual orientation.
But back to the “I was born that way” mantra: I am asked all the time, “Why not just ask a Homo if they were born that way”. Well the answer is, frankly, we just don’t believe you guys. Why? Well the above for one thing, but more importantly, and perhaps more to the point, is that their entire quest for 'rights' is predicated upon the basis that they WERE born that way, and so it would be inimical to their agenda of normalization to admit otherwise; means if you admit it’s a choice you get no rights, so in order to garner rights, they MUST claim it is a choice, whether it is or not.
Considering this, anything they claim simply is not credible, and we therefore must look to other means to arrive at the truth of the matter. When they make claims that are in opposition to basic biology, bio-chemistry and endocrinology ( like knowing if you re str8 or gay when you are born - one doesn’t know anything about anything when you are born; an infant, nor a 5 yo or even a 8yo has developed the cognitive, reasoning or conceptual abilities to coalesce abstract thought ), or claiming you had sexual feelings before puberty, an obviously false statement, it then casts doubt on anything else they might claim; the well has been poisoned.
But this is not the main thrust of the argument that they were ‘born’ that way. Under our system of government, it is well established that one does not obtain rights by behaviors or lifestyles that you CHOOSE to engage in. It therefore follows that the entire foundation of the homosexual agenda to obtain special rights is predicated upon the unproven assumption that they were born that way ( a few articles on epi-genetics by homo activists vs. hundreds of thousands of scientists who have not jumped on this sad bandwagon means nothing ), and that they therefore cannot help themselves any more than a black man can help being black; they can even tell it to you with a straight face. They then connect the righteous quest for equality of our Black brothers and sisters with their quest, and in similar manner to hijacking the word ‘gay’ to be their moniker, they have hijacked the civil rights movement, which I support in full for my black brothers and sisters, and likened it to their own ‘quest’.
It would take a book to refute the latter assumption, a highly insulting one to Blacks. Blacks, as a whole, excepting the liberal minions like the NAACP, do not support homosexuality. Of all the ethnic groups in America, Blacks are the LEAST tolerant of homosexuality, a condition which I can applaud, and wish my white compatriots would adopt. One can read, by prominent well-healed blacks, the denouncements of the gay’s equating the push for perversions with black civil rights. Alveda C. King, niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, has this to say about the NAACP and its embrace of perversion:
“Neither my great-grandfather, an NAACP founder, my grandfather Dr. Martin Luther King Sr., an NAACP leader, my father Rev. A. D. Williams King, nor my uncle Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. embraced the homosexual agenda that the current NAACP is attempting to label as a civil rights agenda,” says King, founder of King for America and Pastoral Associate for Priests for Life”. Read more of Mrs. Kings thoughts, and other prominent black leaders here.
Mrs. King is not alone. Black leaders across the country, en masse, are revolting against the traitorous NAACP. Liberals like to point to the fact that the NAACP is supporting this, but conveniently forget to mention that a great majority of the rank and file black population does not. KENNETH D. JOHNSON, black, and a senior fellow for social policy and civil society at the Seymour Institute for Advanced Christian Studies sums up the fallacious comparison of Black rights:
“There is a specter haunting America. It is the movement to promote and legalize homosexual "marriage." The movement has adopted a cunning political strategy to appeal to everyone from the suburban soccer mom to the urban white-male liberal: It has packaged its demand for the radical redefining of marriage in the rhetoric and imagery of the U.S. civil rights movement.
This strategy, though utterly cynical and possibly racist, has enormous strategic utility. For what reasonable and fair-minded American would object to a movement that conjures up images of Martin Luther King Jr. along with pacifist marchers facing down unleashed attack dogs and men with fire hoses? In the aftermath of that struggle for racial justice, who today is prepared to risk being branded a bigot for opposing the homosexual’s activist agenda?
This strategy is the most brilliant playing of the race card in recent memory. We have not witnessed so brazen a misuse of African-American history for partisan purposes since the “poverty pimps” of more than 35 years ago—who leveraged the American public’s sense of guilt and fair play in order to hustle affirmative action set-asides.
But the partisans of homosexual "marriage" have a problem. There is no evidence in the historiographical literature of the civil rights movement or in the movement’s genesis in the struggle against slavery to support their political and moral argument of equivalence. For it was in the crucible of the unique experience of slavery that the civil rights movement was born.
As the eminent historian Eugene D. Genovese observed more than 30 years ago, the black American experience as a function of slavery is unique and without analogue in the history of the United States. Though other ethnic and social groups have experienced discrimination and hardship, none of their experiences historically and politically can compare with the physical brutality of slavery”.
Please read the rest of the article here. It is quite informative and details precisely why the civil rights movement has been hijacked and has nothing in common with the homosexuals pursuits of “rights”.
Additionally, one must address directly the assertion of “discrimination.” The claim that the definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman constitutes discrimination is based on a false analogy with statutory prohibitions on interracial marriages in many states during much of the 20th century.
This alleged analogy collapses when one considers that skin pigmentation is utterly irrelevant to the procreative and unitive functions of marriage.
Racial differences do not affect or interfere with the ability of sexually complementary spouses to become “one flesh” through sexual intercourse that fulfills the behavioral conditions of procreation.
The law of marital consummation makes it clear that this bodily union serves as the foundation of the profound sharing of life at every level—biological, emotional, dispositional, rational and spiritual.
This complementary form of life-sharing explains not only why marriage can only be between a man and a woman, but also why marriages cannot be between more than two people.
The King family, for the most part, does NOT stand behind Coretta and her traitorous support of homosexual "marriage." King's youngest and only living daughter, Rev. Bernice King, and his niece, Dr. Alveda King mentioned above, have historically thought otherwise. In 2004 the cousins, along with thousands of protesters, participated in a march against same-sex marriage in Atlanta.
In January 2005 Newsweek asked Alveda, who has aligned herself with the religious right and frequently wields her family name and her voice against LGBTQ rights, whether Martin Luther King would be a champion of LGBTQ rights. "No, he would champion the word of God," she replied. "If he would have championed gay rights today, he would have done it while he was here. There was ample opportunity for him to champion gay rights during his lifetime, and he did not do so." She added, "My cousin, the Rev. Bernice King, has said that she knows in her sanctified soul that her father did not take a bullet for same-sex marriage."
And indeed he did not.
But we don’t even need that; If you are a homosexual and REALLY believe that black society ( not black liberal talking heads ) embraces homosexuality, then I invite you to take your sex-partner down to any ghetto in any city in the US, walk through it while engaging in your homo behavior, and see how ‘accepting they are’, and assuming you get out alive, report back to me. You will be assaulted and beaten to an inch of your life, and possibly killed. If that’s what you call acceptance, knock yourself out.
But I already know, as do the homosexuals, what will happen if they go there and do this, and so they will not go, and will instead come up with all manner of rationalizations why they don’t have to go; but we all know why they won’t. This is, perhaps, one of the few ( only? ) redeeming factors of the “hood/gangsta” mentality and lifestyle. You go down into one of these areas, which comprise the vast percentage of the black population, and you are taking your life in your hands. If you’re homo, you might as well just shoot yourself before going in there.
So if someone tells you, “I knew at 5 years old that I was gay”, simple biology calls them a liar, as no human, str8 or homo, has any sexual ‘feelings’ before puberty ( the endocrine system subroutines that are responsible for sexual feelings are dormant until puberty and a 5 yo’s mind has not yet developed the cognitive and reasoning abilities to conceptualize whether he is homo or not ). This is a prime indication that they are liars. Just because you can get your penis into an excrement factory does not mean you were born with an attraction to an anus – an anus is NOT a sexual organ, any more than an ear is – although I imagine that if you could get your penis in an ear, some pervert would have figured it out by now and claimed he knew from 5 that he wanted to screw ears all his life.
Another common complaint I here is, “I just want to be treated like everyone else”.
Fine. Then ACT like everyone else; that is, after all, the ONLY reason that ‘everyone else’ IS everyone else.
Next Article: The Duplicity and Hatred of the Homosexual mindset: Heterosexual Awareness Month taken down by Facebook and the loving, tolerant Left.
Authors note: This next segment is a must read for all, and details the Lefts complete lack of tolerance for beliefs contrary to their own. It contains graphic content not suitable for younger readers. Parental Discretion is Advised.