Infanticide: It’s What Planned Parenthood Is Now Promoting


In a shocking video, reminiscent of then State Senator Barack Obama supporting infanticide, lobbyist Alisa LaPolt Snow, representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes in infanticide. In opposition to a bill being considered by Florida legislators that would provide medical care to an infant who survives a murder attempt by an abortionist.

Representative Jim Boyd asked, "So, um, it is just really hard for me to even ask you this question because I'm almost in disbelief. If a baby is born on a table as a result of a botched abortion, what would Planned Parenthood want to have happen to that child that is struggling for life?"

"We believe that any decision that's made should be left up to the woman, her family, and the physician," Snow answered.

Rep. Daniel Davis then her, "What happens in a situation where a baby is alive, breathing on a table, moving. What do your physicians do at that point?"

"I do not have that information," Snow replied. "I am not a physician, I am not an abortion provider. So I do not have that information."

Representative Jose Oliva then followed up by asking Snow, "You stated that a baby born alive on a table as a result of a botched abortion that that decision should be left to the doctor and the family. Is that what you're saying?"

"That decision should be between the patient and the health care provider," she answered.

"I think that at that point the patient would be the child struggling on the table, wouldn't you agree?" asked Oliva.

"That's a very good question. I really don't know how to answer that," Snow said. "I would be glad to have some more conversations with you about this."

Later on another representative asked the Planned Parenthood representative, "What objection could you possibly have to obligate a doctor to transport a child born alive to a hospital where it seems to me they would be most likely to be able to survive?"

She explained that Planned Parenthood was concerned about "those situations where it is in a rural health care setting, the hospital is 45 minutes or an hour away, that's the closest trauma center or emergency room. You know there's just some logistical issues involved that we have some concerns about."

Now I have several comments to make. First this demonstrates exactly what happens when a culture thinks it knows better than God. As the apostle Paul said, "Professing to be wise, they became fools." Not only should Rep. Boyd be in disbelief over Planned Parenthood and Ms. Snow's stand on infanticide, he and the rest of America should be outraged over the blatant murder of children! My goodness, why was he not in disbelief that the child he supposedly is concerned about, once born, surviving an attempt on its life, and yet he was not in disbelief that the same people were trying to murder it moments, days or even weeks before? If you want to talk disbelief, I'm on the verge of it after hearing this.

Additionally, Snow demonstrates that if this is really about being between a doctor and the patient, then why is Planned Parenthood there? Why are they attempting to put themselves in the mix?

On top of that, Rep. Oliva asked if the baby that was actually born and alive and was struggling for its life, would Snow not agree that the baby was the patient. Her response of "I really don't know how to answer that." Then my question is "What in the H-E- double hockey sticks are you doing in the discussion? If your moral compass is so screwed up that you cannot identify who is a patient and who is not; if your ability to understand right and wrong is so distorted that you would seek to murder the most innocent among us; and if your morality is such that you can actually live with yourself and look at an infant that is lying there breathing and living and say, "Eh, whether it lives or dies is pretty much a decision made by the doctor and the mother," then I think you are not only committing grievous sin, but you are seriously mentally unstable.

In fact, I would have to say that the normal human reaction, for anyone standing by and watching a scenario like that play out would be to attack anyone who attempted to take the child's life and kill them if that is what it took. Call me extreme or whatever, but how someone could see that going on and just stand by and allow a child to have its spine severed or left to die is beyond me.

Furthermore, for someone to argue like this on behalf of child murderers, seems to me to be an accomplice to the crime itself. When are people going to wake up and stand up against these attacks on human life?

Interestingly enough, Health and Human Services is giving Planned Parenthood in the Greater Orlando area over $2 million in tax payer money. If you've had enough of it start making some noise to these people about it and force them to stop funding this abominable organization.

To watch the entire unbelievable account click here.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.






Comments

comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/dmcrane1 Donna M Crane

    I've never seen so much hyped tripe in one place as on this blog. Hyperventilate much people. The woman never once said "infanticide" yet the writer of the article (a man who has less business making judgments on something he will never face) chose to take that word to describe it and stir up the already insane anti-choice, "keep your hands off my guns so I can kill babies if I want", "don't let the government touch my Medicare", "let the sick die if they can't afford insurance", "let the children starve if their parent's can't afford to feed them" cold-hearted, judgmental, faux-Christian, self-righteous, hypocritical nut cases ranting here. I agree, the decision would be with the doctor and the family and God will judge them as he sees fit, not as Tim Brown decides or any of the ranting, doctor murdering, clinic terrorists and arsonists commenting here.

    • Peter Nyikos

      Your opening gambit never came to fruition, Donna. Instead, you hyperventilated with "keep your hands off my guns so I can kill babies if I want" and other bizarre crap nobody in this forum ever contemplated saying. Such people would be "cold-hearted, ..., hypocritical nut cases," as you put it, but they are pure fiction conjured up by your agenda-saturated mind. This applies even more to your hate-driven libel about "doctor murdering clinic terrorists and arsonists commenting here."

      Look the facts in the face if you are human enough to do so: a baby is born alive due to a termination of a pregnancy, most likely with a botched intent to kill. The decision whether to save its life is supposed to be in the hands of the abortionist and his customer, instead of being the expected thing for a physician to do. Actively killing it and letting it die through negligence may not be exactly the same thing, and you might only call the former thing infanticide, but there's not much difference between the two things, is there now?

  • aurora9

    Anyone who allows this to pass, is an accessory to murder. A full term baby who is born, or near full term unborn, is a human being. To kill a human being is considered murder. This Ms.Alisa Snow Job must have ice-water running through her veins, if she has veins at all or is she a robot? We know that she has no heart. She is advocating murder! BO and Michelle are part of this same un-Godly ilk and promote this. I noticed that they let their two daughters live!