Obama Eligibility Case Requested To Move To Oral Arguments At US Supreme Court
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court was asked to move from conference to oral hearing concerning the Obama eligibility case. Dr. Orly Taitz’s application, to be heard on behalf of Edward Noonan, was denied by Justice Kennedy on December 13, 2012. However, the application was refiled and resubmitted to the Chief Justice on December 26, 2012 and listed as “Distributed for Conference of Februrary 15, 2013, according to the SCOTUS website.
According to Suzanne Eovaldi, “February 15, 2013, Attorney Orly Taitz brings her request to move the Obama eligibility challenge from conference to the oral hearing stage at the US Supreme Court. She is moving forward in spite of the fact that four African-American Supreme Court clerks refused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who denied her petition originally. ‘But I resubmitted to Justice Roberts, and he sent it to the conference,’ Taitz said.”
“The California attorney is asking ‘…how do we know that he (Kennedy) ever saw the brief?’ Eovaldi writes. “In no uncertain terms, clerk James Baldin told her that ‘I (Taitz) [was] not allowed to see the signature.’ This denial of her right to see Kennedy’s signature ‘does not make any sense.’”
“Attorney Taitz is presenting evidence that 1 1/2 million invalid voter registrations were filed in the state of California!” Eovaldi concluded. “She is asking US citizens to ‘please, write and fax SCOTUS and demand to see the order by Justice Anthony Kennedy, who allegedly originally denied my case Noonan v Bowen before it was sent by Justice Roberts to the conference.’ Is not this the very least we can do to attempt to clear up this matter?”
Not only is the claim that the birth certificate posted online at the White House website alleged to be a forgery and with good reason to suspect so, but also Obama’s passport records have never been released nor has his college transcripts.
Obama’s Connecticut Social Security Number Flagged By E-Verify[/caption]Additionally there is the issue of his Social Security number allegedly being from Connecticut. Marv Dumon writes,”The SSN apparently fails the government’s own E-Verify system and generates the name ‘Harrison J. Bounel’. Bounel appears to be a relative of Michelle Robinson Obama. The incidence was first reported in the mid-2000s when a background check was conducted on Barack Obama when he was in the process of purchasing a home in Chicago. The purchase became a public scandal when it was discovered that Obama had received a favorable price (worth hundreds of thousands of dollars) on his mansion from a convicted felon and lobbyist.”
Concerned citizen and “employer” of Barack Obama, Linda Jordan, even went so far as to write Obama to have him verify his information, after his Social Security number failed the government’s E-Verification.
Keep in mind that only about one percent of cases such as the one engaged in yesterday by Ms. Taitz are elevated for further review by all nine Supreme Court justices.
On the day that Barack Obama was to deliver the State of the Union address, Taitz declared that the Selective Service Certificate that is used by Barack Obama was never assigned to him.
Taitz has not been the only investigation into the identity of Barack Obama. Most people are aware of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigation. Arpaio referred to the issue as a “national security” iissue. He even took his information to delegates at the Republican National Convention in 2012.
Obama’s attorney argued last year that the online birth certificate is “irrelevant to his placement on the ballot” in the State of New Jersey, basically conceding that it was a forgery.
Even Israeli science determined that Barack Obama’s online birth certificate is a forgery.
What is more amazing than people not looking at this evidence seriously is the fact that Barack and Michelle Obama, along with the Kenyan Ambassador have all openly declared that Kenya is his place of birth. Many other people have said that as well.
For a great Constitutional explanation of what the Founders had in mind about the term “natural born citizen,” I suggest you take the time to read Publius Huldah’s article on it.