Leftist Media Not Ready For Alleged Cop Killer’s Hypocritical Manifesto
Does anyone remember when the Aurora theater shooting took place, how one of the first things mentioned by liberal media pundits was that it was a right winger and a Tea Party guy? Does anyone remember when Representative Gabrielle Giffords was shot by Jared Loughner, who wasn’t political at all, and how all the swirl was that the Tea Party was responsible, despite the fact that the shooter was a liberal? You do? Good. How did those statements turn out? They turned out to be lies. Additionally with each mass shooting the shooter or the family they were affiliated with directly supported liberal Democrats and had nothing to do with the Tea Party or the right wing. The leftist main stream media sure doesn’t want to quote some of the things Chris Dorner wrote in his manifesto. Keep in mind that he has not been tried in a court of law yet, so don’t assume his guilt.
Former Los Angeles police officer Chris Dorner allegedly penned a manifesto and a few interesting points that he made in the manifest demonstrate that he is clearly a liberal, though I must admit that some of the shootings that have taken place by the LAPD while hunting for Dorner seem to prove some parts of his accusations of excessive force against them. He writes:
If you had a well regulated AWB, this would not happen. The time is now to reinstitute a ban that will save lives. Why does any sportsman need a 30 round magazine for hunting? Why does anyone need a suppressor? Why does anyone need a AR15 rifle? This is the same small arms weapons system utilized in eradicating Al Qaeda, Taliban, and every enemy combatant since the Vietnam war. Don’t give me that crap that its not a select fire or full auto rifle like the DoD uses. That’s bullshit because troops who carry the M-4/M-16 weapon system for combat ops outside the wire rarely utilize the select fire function when in contact with enemy combatants.
He goes on to attack the Second Amendment further stating, “The use of select fire probably isn’t even 1% in combat. So in essence, the AR-15 semiautomatic rifle is the same as the M-4/M-16. These do not need to be purchased as easily as walking to your local Walmart or striking the enter key on your keyboard to “add to cart”. All the firearms utilized in my activities are registered to me and were legally purchased at gun stores and private party transfers. All concealable weapons (pistols) were also legally register in my name at police stations or FFL’s. Unfortunately, are you aware that I obtained class III weapons (suppressors) without a background check thru NICS or DROS completely LEGALLY several times? I was able to use a trust account that I created on quicken will maker and a $10 notary charge at a mailbox etc. to obtain them legally. Granted, I am not a felon, nor have a DV misdemeanor conviction or active TRO against me on a NCIC file. I can buy any firearm I want, but should I be able to purchase these class III weapons (SBR’s, and suppressors) without a background check and just a $10 notary signature on a quicken will maker program? The answer is NO. I’m not even a resident of the state i purchased them in. Lock n Load just wanted money so they allow you to purchase class III weapons with just a notarized trust, military ID. Shame on you, Lock n Load. NFA and ATF need new laws and policies that do not allow loopholes such as this. In the end, I hope that you will realize that the small arms I utilize should not be accessed with the ease that I obtained them. Who in there right mind needs a fucking silencer!!! who needs a freaking SBR AR15? No one. No more Virginia Tech, Columbine HS, Wisconsin temple, Aurora theatre, Portland malls, Tucson rally, Newtown Sandy Hook. Whether by executive order or thru a bi-partisan congress an assault weapons ban needs to be re-instituted. Period!!!”
The alleged murderer of at least three people with a firearm writes this stuff and then goes on to write that “Mia Farrow said it best. ‘Gun control is no longer debatable, it’s not a conversation, its a moral mandate.’”
Dorner also went on to praise Senator Dianne Feinstein writing, “you are doing the right thing in leading the re-institution of a national AWB. Never again should any public official state that their prayers and thoughts are with the family. That has become cliche’ and meaningless. Its time for action. Let this be your legacy that you bestow to America. Do not be swayed by obstacles, antagaonist, and naysayers. Remember the innocent children at Austin, Kent, Stockton, Fullerton, San Diego, Iowa City, Jonesboro, Columbine, Nickel Mines, Blacksburg, Springfield, Red Lake, Chardon, Aurora, and Newtown. Make sure this never happens again!!!”
He also wrote about his own cache of small arms and then tried to claim that Cerberus/Freedom Group was responsible for the “Portland mall shooting, Webster, NY, and Sandy Hook massacre.”
The mainstream media won’t point out the obvious hypocrisy of Dorner’s words. This would go against their aid given to Barack Obama and the gun grabbers in Washington, since Dorner gives praise to them, but then demonstrates he doesn’t believe in what he writes.
Second, this demonstrates that the problem here is a psychological one and that it is constantly involving those of a liberal mindset. Dorner clearly was taking matters into his own hands and committing murder. He was not acting in self defense or protecting anyone.
In his first paragraph he indicates that he would commit these crimes.
So in addition to catching him, it seems that we should put forth the argument to point to such a man who talks out of both sides of his mouth. On the one hand, he uses his weapons to murder others and then cries about banning weapons that he himself owns and admits to owning.
Dorner even agrees, at least in print, with Piers Morgan. He writes:
Mr. Morgan, the problem that many American gun owners have with you and your continuous discussion of gun control is that you are not an American citizen and have an accent that is distinct and clarifies that you are a foreigner. I want you to know that I agree with you 100% on enacting stricter firearm laws[.]
The hypocrisy of Dorner’s writings with what he has allegedly done is so apparent that it makes me think of people like Floyd Lee Corkins II, who shot a guard at the Family Research Council and was determined to kill as many people as possible and smear Chick-Fil-A sandwiches all over them, because they were identified as a “hate group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The obvious question is, did Mr. Corkins act out of love or hate? Get the picture?
Where are the Tea Party mass shooters? They aren’t there, are they? Tea Party people are men and women like me and you that hold onto our weapons knowing that they are a last resort against tyrannical government that has decided to bring the fight to us with violence. We take the fight to them in the political arena to try and accomplish a peaceful revolution, not a violent one.
There is enough references to television shows and icons of the media in Dorner’s manifesto to demonstrate just where he gets his information and what has structured his thinking.
Many, who listen to the same things that Dorner listened to, were ready to murder the National Rifle Association’s president and its members with firearms after the Sandy Hook massacre!
Someone in the Tea Party needs to step forward and demonstrate the utter hypocrisy of the left and those who are conducting these violent murderous crimes. They also need to expose the main stream media’s reporting, or lack of reporting as to what the manifesto, which is thousands of words long, really is clear about. After all the media didn’t mind giving us 24/7 coverage of lies regarding the Tea Party and mass shootings did they? Until they were caught red handed and then they quickly changed their tune.
Clearly Dorner was correct in calling out the corruption of the LAPD. Now, we’ll see whether or not he is guilty of the crimes attributed to him.