Is The Obama Administration Weeding Out Military Brass That Will Not Fire On American Citizens?


Ben Swann Full Disclosure conducts a one on one interview with Dr. Jim Garrow who claims the Obama administration is weeding out top military brass who are unwilling to fire upon Americans. Ben talks with Dr. Garrow and asks viewers questions.

Garrow indicates that his source referenced an officer who was called into a private meeting and given a litmus test of whether or not he would be able to fire on Americans. Upon, his answer that he would not do so, he was, in Garrow's words "forced to resign on the spot." Specifically, Garrow indicates that a scenario was with gun confiscation.

While the source is not cited and many people understand keeping sources under wraps, couldn't anyone make this claim? Garrow says that he has known this source for seventeen years. He says that his source is a name that most people in America would know.

One question posed to Garrow was, what was the context of the question? Could it mean to suppress a violent insurrection by extremists groups, whether politically affiliated or not?

Garrow simply referred to what I can only assume if the Feinstein bill, and, in my opinion, didn't represent it fairly, as he said it included "any gun with a handle."

He was also asked if there was evidence that could be provided to give merit to his claims so that his claim could not be "washed away" in a conspiracy theory, even if it is true. He did say that some people question whether he even knew anyone at high levels and he went on to state the people he did know and "sat across the table from" in high levels (ie. Alexander Haig, William Bennet, Bill Simon and others were mentioned).

While Garrow appreciated the question and understood what was being asked, he could provide nothing further. To be fair, this is true in many cases where major stories are broken as well.

He was also asked how many officers this had happened to and he simply referenced those who have called into various shows and indicated that it had gone on, which he said were at least "many dozens."

Additionally, there was the question of why wouldn't these individuals come forward together to out the story and confirm it. While I don't know that Garrow's answer was satisfactory, perhaps it is, as he suggested some sort of "official secrets act," we do know that the Obama administration has been harder on whistleblower's than any administration prior.

I know there are many, many good men and women in our military that will not obey such an order. I also realize there are those who will do and say anything to get ahead or not lose their job. Garrow indicates that his release of this information is to let the public know what is going on and to encourage those in the military that it is OK to say "No."

You can evaluate Garrow's testimony yourself. Many readers at this site already suspect things like this from the Obama administration so this probably does not come as a surprise, especially in light of the bulk solicitations and purchases by this administration. However, I don't have a problem with posting the video as I believe Ben Swann to be one of the top real investigative journalists who desires to get at the truth. To that end, here's the video interview.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

Print Friendly





Comments

comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Sam-Lynn/100001563531530 Sam Lynn

    This is such an important issue it MUST be either proven and verified to be true or false. This isn't something to just bandy around and create hate and discontent amongst the citizenry. All investigative journalistic powers must be brought to bear on this issue because if true, this is a game changer....

  • Jack Frost

    Pretty sure he is trying to stack the upper officers corps with ones that are all for packing and/or swalllowing. (Mullen, e.g.)

  • omega2

    This point was brought up in 1975 by a NAVY LT. COMMANDER who wrote a question bank to do the same as OBUMMMER is now doing to the OFFICERS to cover his BUTT on this FEINSTEIN GUN CONFISCATION OF ALL GUNS WITH A HANDLE AS STATED IN HER SEDITIOUS ACT. Twenty sixteen smells like a KING MIGHT BE BORN sensing OBUUMMMAS actions today.

  • DavidE

    If Obama is even thinking about having OUR army fire on American Citizens, which is why his goons are buying all this ammo, not only should he be impeached, but shot for treason! What will it take to have our leaders take up action against this muslim? GOD BLESS AMERICA

  • ignition

    @Mel Fevruary 17, 2013 at 8:02 pm
    Thanks for your honest post. It assists to maintain a perspective. It reflects the subversive stance of people who value their ethnic heritage more than the nation that assisted their family to become somebody instead of remaining nobody peons of “hispanic” ethnic heritage. Also, your blog about Cruz being hispanic, thus prepared to protect the golf courses, is useful. I like to be well-informed. All this time I thought he was American. It is is useful to know the difference.

    Your blogs reinforce the requirement to enforce immigration laws, that require foreign nationals to at least superficially pledge to support the U.S. Constitution, similar to the requirement for the alien imposter, Obama. Just as guns are not responsible for the actions of criminals, a pledge of allegiance does not turn a subversive traitor into a patriot. I wonder if your son is the officer-traitor who ordered the burst of three fired into the forehead of patriot Pat Tillman, Afghanistan, 2004 ? And perhaps bursts of three into the backs of heads of other patriots, whose status was inadequate for international news - - . “Friendly fire” has been a consistent diversion for too many assassinations for too many years.

  • Viet Nam Vet 67-68

    Every time you see someone in Uniform (armed forces) ask them the Question, would you fire on American Citizens knowing that it is against the Constitution for the President or Congress to order them to do so??? If they say yes then move on till you find a No and ask them to ask and spread the word to not obey an order against the Constitution and place anyone, Officer or otherwise in custody for court marshall. Takes guts but the grunt's out number the Sargents and officers and know how to use all the weapons. We need them as well as the Generals. Viet Nam Vet 67-68
    Never give up your guns Illegal Laws do not count . Contact your local Sheriff and ask if he is going to uphold Illegal Laws or the Constitution and you will know where they stand.

  • victorjv

    My best advice to all those officers who haven't yet reached the questioning point about shooting their fellow Americans is to answer yes to their question because your answer means nothing as far as being an American is concerned. The ones asking this question are the un-Americans. We need people on the inside to help in counter actions against a government gone wild. This helps an underground movement exist.

  • http://www.hearthandhomerealty.com Don B

    I hate to add to this folks but I personally know of two separate people in the military (one groomed to be an officer and one already an officer) but both were asked the same thing. I didn't ask their answer.

  • http://www.hearthandhomerealty.com Don B

    It is so very sad to think this is even a part of our conversation in what was a free Nation. It breaks my heart to see our Good Nation go down as did all the others before us. Who will report when freedom is past? Who will be able to listen? The corrupt media is most to blame. The leaders would never do what they are if the Media reported the truth. They are committing treason most high.

  • Dempsey Coleman

    You bet-cha Ass

  • JimRed

    The response to the question "will you fire on Americans?" should be "I will obey the lawful orders of those appointed over me", which is part of the oath. If the order is given, the first and only target should be the ones GIVING THE ORDERS.

    In preparing for the oppression to come, we need to take a page from the liberal media's playbook. We need to widely and loudly publicize the names and addresses of those who will be GIVING THE ORDERS the way they publicized the names and addresses of legal gun owners.

    "We know where you live" could become a powerful deterrent to the GIVING OF THE ORDERS, and a useful tool for terminating those who GIVE THE ORDERS when necessary.

  • Dennis

    Obama is arming the DHS to murder the American people, it will start with the coming food shortage, and then mass starvation, the people who planned for this will have to protect there property and food from the angry hungry people who did not plan, alot of people will die, and then the government will step in as the great savior, thats when the gun grab will begin, Note: Marshall Law. Million's will die, just like they planned it.

  • http://yahoo Randy Cote

    it is up to the grunts on who they will fire on not the brass the grunt can always turn around and frag the bars. it has been done before and will be done again.
    god bless our troops

  • Jerome from Layton

    There is a video of people being disarmed after the Katrina hurricane. The gun grabbers involved both National Guard and the California Highway Patrol. (Nobody else wears a shoulder shield like them.)
    This happened during the Bush administration and BHO voted numerous times in Illinois to disarm the people.

    Funny thing about the military. After Mi Lai, a set of Regulations were revised to remind the troops that Unlawful Orders should not be obeyed. The tricky and career endangering part is defining "Unlawful". This is where the "weeding" process could be applied.

  • Chris chance

    While I believe obama is capable of this, I don't think I give much creedence to this story. Here is the faulty logic to it. You just detailed an encounter between however many people, of course not mentioning the source, but a very specific set of actions.

    The higher ups will know who to go after (because they were there too, and will know who he is.) Soooo, I have my doubts but I do believe this could happen, obama is a $#!T and is capable of anything since he refuses to follow laws, the Constitution or anything else that gets in the way of his agenda.

    I am just waiting for him to piss off the wrong psycho and they go and take him out.