Ted Nugent To Piers Morgan: If You Try to Disarm Me, "You Can Suck On My Machine Gun"

In a spirited and colorful fashion, as if he could do it any other way, Ted Nugent clearly blows CNN's Piers Morgan away. OK, not literally, but he does makes very clear that anyone that wants to disarm him can suck on his machine gun. Nugent says that those who believe in the Second Amendment will beat those who are out to disarm Americans. They will be voted out of office.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

75 thoughts on “Ted Nugent To Piers Morgan: If You Try to Disarm Me, "You Can Suck On My Machine Gun"

  1. I fully support Nuge and wish more "celebrities" would have the nerve to take a stand like he has. As for the dodging accusation, I'm from that era and dont remember hearing it but it would have been common to get a special exemption during that time and many did!! We all eventually grow up but not all grow up good!! Keep up the fight Ted!

  2. Why do liberals ( and the mainstream media ) want to destroy EVERYTHING our young, beautiful, FREE country has sacrificed to become? I don't understand? I really dont. They are either stupid or just apathetic. I lean towards arrogant yet stupid as ****.

  3. Listen you two bit Brit, I've known some wonderful Britons but you aint one of them! I have a few choice pieces you can suck on when you get through with Ted's Machine Gun.

  4. You need to run for President "Ted Nugent!!" You are a Smart Man!

    Piers Morgan go back to where you came - we do not want are need you over here.

  5. kevin ashworth says:

    what an idiot,p.morgan needs to go back to england......TED IS THE MAN!

  6. It is to be hoped that there are more men out there that are unafraid of the thugs and bullies which consist of obama thugs and black trayvon gangs

  7. God Send Us Men

    Lyrics written 1909 by Frederick J. Gillman (1866-1949)
    Published: 1916 / Tune: Kedron, 1799

    God send us men whose aim 'twill be
    Not to defend some ancient creed,
    But to live out the laws of Christ
    In every thought and word and deed.

    God send us men alert and quick
    His lofty precepts to translate,
    Until the laws of Christ become
    The laws and habits of the state.

    God send us men of steadfast will,
    Patient, courageous, strong and true,
    With vision clear and mind equipped
    His will to learn, his work to do.

    God send us men with hearts ablaze,
    All truth to love, all wrong to hate;
    These are the patriots nations need;
    These are the bulwarks of the state.

    If these concepts were needed then, how much more do they need to be addressed today!?! Who amongst you would find fault with these sentiments? Only those adversarial to Truth and the perfect Laws of Liberty spoken of & set forth in the Bible.

  8. We need a whole bunch more Teds and a whole lot less liberal ignorant twits! Come get my guns, guys! I will be waiting. Bird shot or steel shot? You choose!

  9. piers morgan is a complete idiot and that's what obama likes as that's the mentality of obama voter base.

    God bless gun legal owner and all those who oppose guns go straight to hell.

  10. Go Uncle Ted!
    Maybe he should have pointed out the 2nd Amendment was to safeguard against TYRANTY
    imposed on us by the BRITISH!

  11. Wasn't Ted the guy who loudly claimed in November 2011 that if Obama were re-elected, he (Ted) would either be dead or in jail by now? What a shame he was wrong.

    And nothing says "American" better than loud calls for the deportation, or elimination, of everyone who disagrees with you.
    Newsflash: the Founders didn't tell those who disagreed with them to take a hike. They listened to their arguments and considered them brothers nonetheless.
    The US weren't founded upon the vile hatred you RWNJ's espouse.

  12. Ted Nugent: "What I want is the Second Amendment. We the People, free individuals to have the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of themselves. Find fault with that."

    Despite his foul mouth, you can't help but love Ted Nugent. That said, I do find fault with what he stated. In fact, I believe his position has made it possible for the licensing and limiting of our RESPONSIBILITY to bear arms in defense of our ourselves, our families, and neighbors:

    "...The Bible knows nothing of rights, only responsibilities. Rights are easily licensed and
    limited (consider what has occurred with the Second Amendment since its adoption by the States). Responsibilities remain unchanged, regardless what the government says or does:

    'But if any provide not for his own [including protection], and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.' (1 Timothy 5:8)

    "We don’t need the Second Amendment (which merely recognizes a right) when
    we have Psalm 149 (which charges us with a responsibility):

    'Let the high praises of God be in their mouth, and a twoedged sword [or today’s equivalent] in their hand; to execute vengeance upon the heathen, and punishments upon the people; to bind their kings with chains, and their nobles with fetters of iron; to execute upon them the judgment written: this honour have all his saints. Praise ye Yah.'
    (Psalm 149:6-9)

    "Implicit in this Psalm is that only the righteous are to be armed. However, since the Second Amendment was added to the Bill of Rights, the “right” to bear arms in defense of ourselves, our families, and neighbors has been incrementally taken away from the unrighteous and righteous alike. The Second Amendment has actually facilitated gun control, including gun-free zones such as Sandy Hook Elementary School...."

    Excerpted from "Newtown’s Massacre, Today’s Cultural Abyss, and Gun-Free Zones." Click on my name, then our web site. The Blog can be found at the top of the home page.

    • Davy Crockett says:

      Despite Ted Weiland’s legalist position, we do have “rights”. In regards to our relationship with God, we don’t in a sense since He is the Almighty and Creator, but even there we granted rights through Jesus Christ such as:

      "Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.

      “Again I say to you, that if two of you agree on earth about anything that they may ask, it shall be done for them by My Father who is in heaven.” Matt. 18:18-19

      In these two passage we two “rights” given us through Jesus under the New Covenant. An honest study of the Bible will reveal many more, but this contradicts the theology of Mr. Wieland’s Preterism and Reconstruckist theology.

      When we speak of true rights, we speaking in regards to our relationships with other humans and with governments. In this horizontal relation, we do indeed have rights. Without such things as our constitution and Bill of Rights, we would have lost these God given rights far sooner had we adopted your purposed “theocracy”. Being that we do not have direct contact with our Deity as they did in the Old Testament and yet still fell, a true “theocracy” would be impossible. It would deteriorate into another man centered religious state in a generation or two (as Israel did every time in the Old Testament) as did the Holy Roman Empire, the Islamic countries and even our pre-revolution colonist who also tried to set up a theocracy of sorts. Our founding documents where only meant to recognize the inalienable, God authored and given rights we are born with so each succeeding elected official would know what they are without out a doubt. Not so “Judges” (Book of Judges) or priests would reinterpret our rights at will as they have done in the above religious based states.

    • Good try Davey, but neither of those are rights, but authority
      resulting from our relationship with Christ. As for the Bill of Rights:
      how can they be from Yahweh when nearly every one of the first 10
      Amendments are, in some fashion, antithetical, if not hostile, to
      Yahweh's sovereignty and morality? See "Bible Law vs. the United States
      Government: The Christian Perspective."

      I'm promoting responsibility to Yahweh over self-claimed rights--I'd be careful of calling that legalism.

      again, you seem to think that we're better off with a government
      fashioned by finite men based upon their fickle edicts than we are with
      one based upon Yahweh's perfect law and altogether righteous judgments.
      Well, take a good look around you and you'll see what comes from the

      I'd also be very careful of comparing Yahweh's law with Sharia.

  13. Pier's Morgan, Can swim back to England, escorted by ~ SHARKS!

  14. Ideally all the DIMLIB and 7/nigger scum will be eliminated!

  15. Ted Nugent for President! Why not, Reagan did it.

  16. I have a bull barrel he can suck on too. Low life traitor of a twit. We kicked Their butts once and we can do it again. Won't be necessary though as most Brits have far more common sense than the idiots like Piers. Give them a little fame and suddenly they think their IQ has taken quantum leaps forward. NOT! Just as dumb as ever. One thing I learned in the few years I worked around movie people in Hollywood and Malibu is there are a sizeable group who are very intelligent; these are very common folks even though they have a measure of fame. I knew one star whom you could find in the super market parking lot sitting on the hood of his car sipping coffee and chatting with people. The other group likes to think they are God's gift to humanity. These are snobs and act as though everyone else owes them their rapt attention as they spew their drivel.