Schumer: We're At A Tipping Point On Gun Control


Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) appeared on CBS' Face the Nation on Sunday and declared that the shooting that took place at Newtown, Connecticut, "could be the tipping point” in advancing gun control in Congress."

Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer asked, “Where do you see this going?”

The Senator said, "“Well I think we could be at a tipping point for two reasons: a tipping point where we might actually get something done. First, this was not a single incident. It followed a series of others. In the last few months, we’ve had mass shootings in Oregon and Wisconsin and Colorado."

“When the public sees these as isolated incidents, they’re less upset than when they occur one after the other, and the public will not accept, the public will not accept as a new normal one of these incidents every month – these mass shootings,” Schumer said.

“Second," the Senator continued, "of course, it involved children, and it’s so poignant to see those pictures, and I read the story in the newspaper where the families waited in the firehouse, and when they found that a young child had survived, they called the parents out, and there were other parents waiting. What agony! What horror! So I think we can get something done.”

Schumer is one that supports Dianne Feinstein's assault weapons ban bill that would ban certain weapons and limit magazines to only 10 bullets, which they claim would make it "harder for mentally unstable people to get guns." Obviously no one can tell us how banning one set of guns versus another and limiting the number of rounds a gun can carry at once will make it harder for anyone to get guns. This is merely an emotional argument.

“I think we have to do things that protect the Second Amendment rights of legitimate gun owners, but three things that we should focus on: We don’t know the details yet, so you can’t say that any of them would have stopped this incident, but you can say they are parts of the pattern,” Schumer said.

“One is to ban assault weapons, to try and reinstate the assault weapons ban," he said. "The second is to limit the size of clips to maybe no more than 10 bullets per clip. And the third would be to make it harder for mentally unstable people to get guns. Each has had something to do with these other incidents – obviously assault weapons."

Schumer added, “The clips – you may remember when Jared Loughner in the Gabby Giffords shooting tried to reload. That’s when he was tackled. And it seems most of the people who were involved had mental instability. So those are the three areas that I think we will focus on, and I’m hopeful that there can be some kind of change.”

Senator Schumer, not only has a concealed carry permit, but look at the kind of weapon he fires. I'll bet to the liberals this could be considered an "assault weapon."

As with anything assault weapons are not the issue and neither is high capacity magazines. Again, how can one "protect Second Amendment rights of legitimate gun owners" and yet keep them form obtaining weapons that would, as the Second Amendment read, allow them to form a "well regulated militia." You don't do that by not having access to rifles currently on the market.

Liberals merely react emotionally, just as many react, especially when children are involved. Were any of the shootings emotional during 2012? Of course, but our response, when it comes to law, should not be. Mr. Schumer, you are forgetting something, criminals don't follow your laws! Ban every gun by law and see who has them and who uses them. All that blood is on your hands, not ours. Stop creating "Gun Free Zones" as though criminals will see those and think, "Yeah I should obey the law." Stop encroaching on the rights of the people and start giving the criminals true justice.

Watch the encounter below:

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.






Comments

comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chris-Holley/1178389425 Chris Holley

    Another shooting involving evil...but with a different outcome...READ:

    The Pearl High School shooting was a school shooting
    that took place on October 1, 1997 at Pearl High School in Pearl, Mississippi.
    The gunman, 16-year-old Luke Woodham (born February 5, 1981), killed two
    students and injured seven others at his high school. Before the shooting at
    Pearl High School began, Woodham stabbed and bludgeoned his mother to death in
    his home.

    The incident began on the morning of October 1, 1997
    when Luke Woodham fatally stabbed and bludgeoned his mother, Mary Woodham, as
    she prepared for a morning jog. At his trial, Woodham claimed that he could not
    remember killing his mother.

    Woodham drove his mother's car to Pearl High School.
    Wearing an orange jumpsuit and a trenchcoat, he made no attempt to hide his
    rifle. When he entered the school, he fatally shot Lydia Kaye Dew and Christina
    Menefee, his former girlfriend. Pearl High School assistant band director, Jeff
    Cannon, was standing five feet away from Dew when she was fatally shot. Woodham
    went on to wound seven others before leaving, intending to drive off campus and
    conduct another shooting at the nearby Pearl Junior High School.

    However, assistant principal Joel Myrick had retrieved
    a .45 pistol from the glove compartment of his truck and subdued Woodham inside
    his mother's car. Then Myrick demanded "Why did you shoot my kids?"
    to which Woodham replied, "Life has wronged me, sir."

    Minutes before he started the shooting, he gave the
    following message to a friend:

    “ I am not insane, I am angry. I killed because people
    like me are mistreated every day. I did this to show society, push us and we
    will push back. ... All throughout my life, I was ridiculed, always beaten,
    always hated. Can you, society, truly blame me for what I do? Yes, you will.
    ... It was not a cry for attention, it was not a cry for help. It was a scream
    in sheer agony saying that if you can't pry your eyes open, if I can't do it
    through pacifism, if I can't show you through the displaying of intelligence,
    then I will do it with a bullet. ”

    On October 8, 1997 Grant Boyette, Delbert Shaw, Donald
    Brooks, Wesley Brownell, Daniel Thompson and Justin Sledge were arrested in
    suspicion of conspiring with Woodham to commit the shooting. During his trial,
    Woodham claimed to have gotten ideas of committing the murders by being
    involved with a Satanic cult. Woodham admitted to being a Satanist, and claimed
    that his friend Grant Boyette invited Woodham to join a Satanic group known as
    "The Kroth." He claimed that Boyette told him that he had
    "potential to do something great." Woodham said that Boyette promised
    him that he could get his ex-girlfriend back or get even through black magic.

    After his conviction Woodham converted to Christianity,
    and said the following in a letter written to evangelical minister David
    Wilkerson:

    David, I receive your sermons through the mail. I am
    one of the school shooters. I’m the one they blame for starting it all off. On
    October 1, 1997, I went into Pearl High School and killed two students and
    wounded seven. I also killed my mother before this. After I came to jail I got
    saved. If there is any way that I can help your ministry, I would love to.
    Maybe I could give you my testimony. I’ll do anything to help. I look forward
    to your sermons each month…

    Mississippi State Penitentiary, where Luke Woodham is
    incarcerated.

    Different Outcome isn’t it?

    Why hasnt this been in the news referring back to it?
    They talk about the others. Kid kills mom, shoots other kids? wanted to kill
    more? Still evil with the same intent, but a different outcome thanks to a
    Principle and a .45 cal Pistol. Yes people, an armed teacher, staff memebr or
    retired cop could have made it a difference. You would be surprised what
    someone would do to protect the inoccent.

    When will you learn that a sign on a pole telling everyone that its a "gun free zone" only tells an evil criminal that its a "free fire zone" and that no one will stop them from
    killing......
    So Schumer, you tell me which one worked?

  • Tom hockey

    we are at the cliff?

    only liberal gun grabbers think so.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chris-Holley/1178389425 Chris Holley

    Patrick James posted on December 17, 2012 14:56 Great words.....

    My morning coffee was privy to an interesting conversation today, and it was more than a lesson in history, it was a lesson in media propaganda as well. Two elderly gentlemen were discussing our current events, when a young man interjected himself into their conservative conversation. "I can't believe you two are seriously entertaining the thoughts of arming teachers?" the young man spouted as the two elderly men turned their attention toward the outburst. "That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard! We should be trying to eliminate these problems, by reducing the number of 'assault weapons' out on the streets." Both older men shook their heads and resumed their conversation as the young man continued to hound them, "What? The news is saying it's the 2nd worst incident in history, just behind Virginia Tech!" Ah... this is where things got very interesting, and I learned something I did not know as well.

    "I believe we were having a conversation among ourselves," the one bearded gentlemen finally relinquished. "but since you so rudely interjected your two cents, you're gonna have the opportunity to learn something today!" He then turned toward me, winked and continued. "Son, do you have any idea what you're talking about?" Not giving the younger man an opportunity to respond he quickly continued. "First off, the only way evil wins, is for good to do nothing! Sometimes you just can't wait on help. If someone in that school had been allowed to carry a concealed weapon, it may not of eliminated death that day, but it very well may have minimized it!" The young man smiled and shook his head, "That's crazy talk old man! Having people carrying guns in a school is only going to make things worse." I have to pause for a second to say that the 'oh really' look this elderly gentlemen gave this guy was priceless.

    "I guess in this instance we'll never know, now will we?" He asked as the young man fell short of an answer. "Certainly common sense tells us that these types of things are not happening at your local police stations, gun shops or gun shows where there are many weapons present. They are happening in places were there are no weapons present. Hmm, makes a man wonder why that is?" Myself I absolutely love sarcasm, and hearing this older gentlemen patronizing his younger adversary made me chuckle. "Now, obviously you're a gun control proponent," the older man began, "which makes absolutely no sense to me. You're trying to tell me that a criminal will pay attention to those laws you're proposing?" he asked. "Well...." the younger man stammered, realizing he was caught in a catch-22. "Exactly," the older man exclaimed, "criminals are simply that... criminals. They are already breaking a law or they wouldn't be called crime-inals, right?"

    "Now, you claim this is the 2nd worst school related tragedy in American history, right?" he asked as the younger man nodded in agreement, although his obvious enthusiasm was now waning dramatically. "Well son, I'm here to tell you that it's a God damn lie! These liberal bastards are forgetting about a certain incident that happened in 1927, in a town about 20 miles from where I was born." You could see his eyes narrow and his weathered face furrow just a bit deeper as he began to recall the story.

    "The newspapers called it the 'Bath School Disaster' and it happened in Bath, Michigan during the spring of 1927! There were 38 children murdered in that school, not to mention a couple of teachers and a few other adults. Shoot there were over 50 injured!" The young man looked on in disbelief and truthfully, so did I. I was born about 80 miles from Bath and had never heard of this incident. "Well it goes to show you that it isn't anything new then," the young man interjected, "we should've been working on reducing the number of people allowed to have guns for a long time." The older man slowly shook his head in disbelief as a wry smile crossed his face. "Son, guns had nothing to do with that incident. The man used dynamite to blow up the school! He killed his wife, blew up his own farm, detonated a bomb that he'd planted inside the school, and then blew up himself and several others just outside the school."

    As the young man walked away dejectedly, I shook my head at this tidbit of information as I overheard this gentleman's companion make one final comment; "That boy is the reason this next generation will give up all our 'rights'! They have absolutely no clue as to what's really happening in life.. that it's all been done before, and there's always gonna be evil people out there who just don't care!"

    So my question is; "Is our main stream media omitting this historical fact or are they outright lying about it?" I personally think the liberal 'gun grabbers' have their own political agenda and 'by hook or by crook', they're gonna see it through. We as a Nation cannot be buffaloed by these people. We can all agree that any incident is too much, shoot, one innocent life is too much! My heart goes out to all of those that have ever lost a loved one, but we cannot let our government make us feel guilty about our right to 'keep and bear arms'. We cannot allow them to omit or lie about the facts surrounding these incidences and we cannot let them continue to publish the names of these perpetrators. Report on the crimes, but leave the criminals in obscurity where they belong.

    • freedomgirl

      Wow, awesome comment Chris...
      I picture those 2 old men as locals in our VFW.
      I picture the young man as someone who never defended our country.
      Nice story, become an Author...
      God Bless...

  • Mike_Sr

    The question is, is can we tip it in the direction of the 2nd Amendment?

    Can we train and arm teachers and staff so that this will **never** happen again.

    Remember had the principal and counsellor been armed at least one of them would have walked away and not a single child would have been harmed!

    Or, do the short-sighted demon inspired gun and freedom haters insure that it happens again? Only with a knife. A sword. Homemade or otherwise. Or even a household chemical home made bomb?

    The *only* way to stop suh an act is pervent and when prevntion fails being armed adequately to address the threat with extreme prejudice.

    • OldNYFirefighter

      There are no guarantees you will wake up tomorrow morning. Nothing is 100% effective. If it was, there would be no drunk drivers, speeders, thieves, shootings or any other act that is against the law. Just because you CCW does not mean you will never die to violence. Even though a shooter doesn't know you have a weapon, does not mean he won't shoot you first. It would depend on his mental state, are you his closest or easiest target, is he a sociopath or just a thief. There are so many factors it would be impossible to say you can stop such an incident. It is positively a fact that if you are not armed, you have ZERO chance of surviving if his intent is to kill as many as possible. Other determining factors would be your training. Are you in a spot that have other people in your line of fire. Many questions that proper training would only take you a few seconds to determine. Even then if he was looking or aiming directly at you, your best action would be to duck. You can't dodge a bullet, you are not that fast. That said, if the shooter is distracted for just two or three seconds, I can guess he would have two bullets headed for the center of his chest within the next half a second. Even with body armor, a 9mm or larger round will knock a 250lb man down & it would hurt him. So much he may give up or kill himself as did this shooter. If any one of the adults that first saw the shooter had fired at him he may have fled, been dispatched, killed himself or gave up. Doing nothing or physically attacking him was a futile & fatal action which resulted in their execution one at a time. At the very least if one of those people had a weapon & some training they would have had at the very least a 50/50 chance of survival & possibly 100%. With no CCW person it was 100% execution & almost ZERO chance of survival.

  • http://www.facebook.com/TomDriscollSr Tom Driscoll Sr.

    The guns are NOT the problem. they are the means used to reach an end, Killing innocent people. (Presumably innocent, in most of the cases). Abortion does the same thing, and the victims are ALWAYS Innocent. The problem is "What drives the perpetrator to perform this senseless act of Human Destruction? In the past, Explosives, Automobiles, Knives, Bats, Poisons, Axes Fire, etc have been used for the same end. Should we put controls on All of these by banning these items also? BAN all guns and armies will still go to war using swords, lances, bow and arrows, GET THE POINT? We are a Civilization (Using the word Loosely) of people who Kill, whether it be other humans, animals, bugs and even good ideas. The Anti-Gun faction are using this tragedy in Ct. as their soap box for their agenda. Just remember that Guns won our right to Speak our mind and state our opinion. Out of millions of gun owners, only a very few are unbalanced enough to cause such a tragic Event. The bottom line is that this was caused by a person that was mentally unbalanced, and used guns to wreak havoc on the Connecticut school. More people are killed in Auto Accidents than by Shootings. One of the responsibility of owning a gun is to keep it out of the reach of people who should Not have access to them.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chris-Holley/1178389425 Chris Holley

    Moron....Another shooting involving evil...but with a different outcome...READ:

    The Pearl High School shooting was a school shooting that took place on October 1, 1997 at Pearl High School in Pearl, Mississippi. The gunman, 16-year-old Luke Woodham (born February 5, 1981), killed two students and injured seven others at his high school. Before the shooting at Pearl High School began, Woodham stabbed and bludgeoned his mother to death in his home.

    The incident began on the morning of October 1, 1997 when Luke Woodham fatally stabbed and bludgeoned his mother, Mary Woodham, as she prepared for a morning jog. At his trial, Woodham claimed that he could not remember killing his mother.
    Woodham drove his mother's car to Pearl High School. Wearing an orange jumpsuit and a trenchcoat, he made no attempt to hide his rifle. When he entered the school, he fatally shot Lydia Kaye Dew and Christina Menefee, his former girlfriend. Pearl High School assistant band director, Jeff Cannon, was standing five feet away from Dew when she was fatally shot. Woodham went on to wound seven others before leaving, intending to drive off campus and conduct another shooting at the nearby Pearl Junior High School.

    However, assistant principal Joel Myrick had retrieved a .45 pistol from the glove compartment of his truck and subdued Woodham inside his mother's car. Then Myrick demanded "Why did you shoot my kids?" to which Woodham replied, "Life has wronged me, sir."

    Minutes before he started the shooting, he gave the following message to a friend:
    “ I am not insane, I am angry. I killed because people like me are mistreated every day. I did this to show society, push us and we will push back. ... All throughout my life, I was ridiculed, always beaten, always hated. Can you, society, truly blame me for what I do? Yes, you will. ... It was not a cry for attention, it was not a cry for help. It was a scream in sheer agony saying that if you can't pry your eyes open, if I can't do it through pacifism, if I can't show you through the displaying of intelligence, then I will do it with a bullet. ”
    On October 8, 1997 Grant Boyette, Delbert Shaw, Donald Brooks, Wesley Brownell, Daniel Thompson and Justin Sledge were arrested in suspicion of conspiring with Woodham to commit the shooting. During his trial, Woodham claimed to have gotten ideas of committing the murders by being involved with a Satanic cult. Woodham admitted to being a Satanist, and claimed that his friend Grant Boyette invited Woodham to join a Satanic group known as "The Kroth." He claimed that Boyette told him that he had "potential to do something great." Woodham said that Boyette promised him that he could get his ex-girlfriend back or get even through black magic.

    After his conviction Woodham converted to Christianity, and said the following in a letter written to evangelical minister David Wilkerson:

    David, I receive your sermons through the mail. I am one of the school shooters. I’m the one they blame for starting it all off. On October 1, 1997, I went into Pearl High School and killed two students and wounded seven. I also killed my mother before this. After I came to jail I got saved. If there is any way that I can help your ministry, I would love to. Maybe I could give you my testimony. I’ll do anything to help. I look forward to your sermons each month…

    Mississippi State Penitentiary, where Luke Woodham is incarcerated.

    Different Outcome isn’t it?

    Why hasnt this been in the news referring back to it? They talk about the others. Kid kills mom, shoots other kids? wanted to kill more? Still evil with the same intent, but a different outcome thanks to a Principle and a .45 cal Pistol. Yes moron, an armed teacher, staff memebr or retired cop could have made it a difference. You would be surprised what someone would do to protect the inoccent.

    When will you learn that a sign on a pole telling everyone that its a "gun free zone" only tells an evil criminal that its a "free fire zone" and that no one will stop them from killing......

    • robert_gunther

      Politicians pray on the ignorant for votes how do you think
      they get in office.

      And the liberal media is on their side you will never hear of the ones with a twist or a better outcome because they can’t exploit it for votes or ratings, sad very sad.

    • freedomgirl

      Wow, your stories are overwhelming and need to be heard.
      Yes, every Principle in every school needs to be armed and educated on how to use a fire arm.
      Unfortunately, today, most Principles are Liberal and disagree with killing anyone.
      God works in their favor when they want it to, I Shall Not Kill.
      A vote needs to be accounted by School Principles and Vice Principles on this Right To Bear Arms. It should Not be voted by The House without Their and Our consent.

    • OldNYFirefighter

      Excellent! I have been telling this to people for twenty years. Some, mostly Conservatives get it. Liberals, not so much & some even called ma a liar, but that has not & will not stop me from stating "gun free zones' should be relabeled "free fire or killing zone", because to the criminal or mentally unstable that is exactly what they are. If guns are not available, they will find another way, as the human mind is inventive even when defective.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bob-Marshall/100001163952013 Bob Marshall

    We must never forget that once Hitler assumed control of Nazi Germany, he did three things. Implemented gun control legislation.,legalized abortions and nationalized education.

    • OldNYFirefighter

      Was he half black?

  • BigJohn555

    Average number of killings in mass shootings when stopped by police: 18.25
    Average number of killings in mass shootings when stopped by civilians: 2.2

    Being "on the scene" beats being called "to the scene" every time.

    Disarming innocent people does not protect innocent people.

    • OldNYFirefighter

      NY City Police officers shot one man & injured 7 to 9 people with wayward bullets. NY City police are more dangerous then the street thugs, they usually miss.

  • BigJohn555

    1.3 million unborn babies are murdered in the USA every year...

  • popham

    We are so blessed to have the sputterings of Feinstein, Schumer and Bloomberg,
    aren't we? My God, the victims are not even in their graves yet, Newtown is still
    grieving and the whole country shares their sadness, but by God these lowlife
    liberal Democrats are spitting out their diatribe on guns, gun control and possibly
    the 2nd Amendment. These 'people' have no hearts, no shame and no respect
    for the families or their dead children. We should all be emailing these fools and
    tell them to just shut up.
    Never forget my fellow Americans, that liberalism is tantamount to
    giving ignorance a political voice.
    May God Bless Newtown and all its residents.

    • robert_gunther

      All three when they open their mouth to talk I puke.

    • OldNYFirefighter

      Don't forget McCarthy - (her husband was killed & son injured on Long Island RR by a black that hated whites), Lugar - fake Second Amendment supporter & Feinstein - Assault Weapons Ban law writer.

  • Wayright2

    The Second Amendment is one of the checks and balances designed into
    our constitution to have the means to prevent tyranny or to overthrow
    tyrannical governments. It is also a deterrent to countries, regimes or other
    organized groups who would wish us harm. Semi-Automatic "assault rifles" are one
    notch below the full auto versions our military uses. In Switzerland every
    household has at least one full auto rifle and an individual trained in the use
    of it. Do they have a murderous crime problem there? Why not?

    We have a societal problem that may be caused by a number of factors
    such as drug use, violent video games, and the diminishment of the influence
    of a higher power in our daily lives.

    • freedomgirl

      Also disconcerned parents and selfishness is overbearing in our society.
      Most people today are very selfish and don't look at a community as a whole, they see it as an envy grab bag. It's not keeping up with the Joneses anymore, it's getting past them to never look back. 'I Won!.. Yea!!!'... attitude...
      What do they win?
      Emptiness Spiritually, Solitude and Desperation.
      No God, No Love and No Forgiveness...

    • OldNYFirefighter

      If I smacked any of the anti-gun Congress Critters in the head with a baseball bat, would it now be called an assault bat? Just askin, as that seems to be their logic.

  • tommyboy

    Shumer is the most despicable person in the senate. He has a carry permit and yet he would deny the average citizen that he claims champion the same privilege

    • OldNYFirefighter

      He has a NY City permit, which is almost impossible to get unless you are one of his cronies & can pay out $200/ year. I'll bet Schumer pays nothing, but kisses bloomer's butt. NYC Permit is separate from NY State CCW Permit. NYS permit is lifetime, but revokable for even a minor infraction. Some judges limit carrying to target & hunting, otherwise it is illegal.They write or stamp your Permit - deface a legal document, but most judges CCW even in Court.

  • DOOM

    we already know the result of gun control: law abiding citizens turn into law abiding victims.

    • Mike_Sr

      You are absolutely right the alternative is to become a living criminal.
      Some choice!

    • freedomgirl

      Perfect, couldn't of said it better!!!

    • OldNYFirefighter

      NY State law already limits Magazines (not clips) to ten rounds unless they were manufactured before the assault weapons ban went into effect. They are almost impossible to find & if available are very expensive. Schumer is shooting a extended magazine (20 > 30 rounds) semi-auto pistol. One he doesn't think you should be allowed to have, but perfectly fine for him. There is a bill in NY House for Micro stamping on firing pin, which is another feel good do nothing law. The Governor just rescinded a Ballistic Fingerprint Law that cost $44 million over ten years & never resulted in an arrest or conviction.

    • DAVID PEACOCK

      good job, laws do not stop criminals and nut cases.

    • WASP

      Or slaves of a lawless dictator. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, the Kenyan.

  • dndvaughn

    I think 'Chuck' is a perfect example of the politicians of today. When trying to get re-elected, he couldn't say enough to the pro gun crowd about how he supported them and the second amendment. The politicians don't seem to get it, (or maybe they do!), but if they ban 1 gun type, then they'll find another they don't like, and so on. I don't like assault weapons, but I don't feel it's my place to criticize those who do like them. They use them responsibly and with utmost safety in mind. I've used in the service, but I don't feel comfortable using one. So I don't.
    One of the problems I see, of many, is that these antigun people have no idea of the enjoyment we get from shooting, the challange of target shooting, competeing against others. They don't see the shooting sports as a 'sport'.
    I believe that 90% of these come from the US Cities, and look down on those of us that don't inhabit such vile locations. They believe that we are beneath them.
    When the government starts to take over , as they appearantly seem to be doing, I want my guns to fight off any 'tyranical government'. Then we'll see how they respond to 'gun control'.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jerry-Robison/100000629907048 Jerry Robison

    The hypocrisy of Schumer and his ilk makes me want to puke.

  • voldemort

    Guns don't kill liberals do

  • Greg

    Al DeMato was right - Schumer is a putz.

  • mudguy1

    What a wonderful world we will have if Chuckie boy gets stricter gun laws, then we will not need for the secret service to carry guns.

  • NWFLconservative

    No stupid little Chuckie, liberals like you are facing the tipping point of why the 2nd Amendment was written in the first place. You epically ignorant fool, this WAS an isolated incident. And you moron, it is called a MAGAZINE NOT A CLIP. Your unfamiliarity with even the most basic of firearm terms is proof positive you KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT THEM.

    The day you come for our guns is the day you Constitution hating enemies of the American people will finally realize WHY we have the Second Amendment in the first place and I sure as hell would not want to be in your shoes on that day.

    • OldNYFirefighter

      He knows just enough to be dangerous to the Second Amendment!

  • Markus Reborn

    Yes, look at the weapon Schumer has! Can you say "Liberal Hypocrite", boys and girls.

    • OldNYFirefighter

      There is a Military version of that handgun that is fully automatic - machine pistol. I don't think that one is, as it would put skid marks in his knickers if he pulled the trigger on a fully auto model. That isn't the one he carries as a CCW.