Queen James Bible: Homosexuals Pervert The Scriptures


A new perversion is out. Yes, you knew once homosexuals had come out of the closet they were not content with just that. They are indoctrinating the children of America, demanding special rights, redefining words like gay and marriage and now, they are putting forth a perversion of the Bible. The New Queen James Version of the Bible has hit the marketplace at Amazon.com.

The book description at Amazon reads:

The Queen James Bible is based on The King James Bible, edited to prevent homophobic misinterpretation.

Homosexuality in The Bible
Homosexuality was first mentioned in the Bible in 1946, in the Revised Standard Version. There is no mention of or reference to homosexuality in any Bible prior to this - only interpretations have been made. Anti-LGBT Bible interpretations commonly cite only eight verses in the Bible that they interpret to mean homosexuality is a sin; Eight verses in a book of thousands!

The Queen James Bible seeks to resolve interpretive ambiguity in the Bible as it pertains to homosexuality: We edited those eight verses in a way that makes homophobic interpretations impossible.

No, it actually doesn't seek to "resolve interpretive ambiguity." What it does seek is to rewrite Scripture.

For instance, take note of what the publisher says with regards to such passages as Genesis 19:5 concerning the men of Sodom:

Genesis 19:5

And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? Bring them out unto us, that we may know them. (KJV)

We side with most Bible scholars who understand the story of Sodom and Gomorra to be about bullying strangers. Strangers were not well-treated or well-regarded at the time of Bible (hence so much of the Word urging the love and acceptance of others).

We know Lot asks that the men do not “know” the angel visitors “wickedly,” (Genesis 19:7), in other words “brutally,” which we understand to mean “rape.” We know from Leviticus that one is not allowed to have sex with a beast, and angels are not human. Plus, the passage mentions the men of the city; Obviously women and children aren’t going to be invited to a dominating and public rape, but we know there were women and children in Sodom because Lot had daughters. Rapes such as this one are common between men in prison; they aren’t sexual acts, they are power-dominating acts.

Therefore, we changed the verse to the following:

Genesis 19:5

And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? Bring them out unto us, that we may rape and humiliate them. (QJV) (Page 21)

This is a complete twisting of the text. Nothing in the text and certainly not the word "know" should be understood as "brutally" nor as necessarily "rape." In fact, in the Book of Genesis, the same word used "עדי", in the Hebrew language, is also used with regards to sexual relations. For instance, Genesis 4:1 reads, "And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD." Adam didn't brutally rape his wife. He lovingly knew her intimately and she conceived. These perverts are simply twisting the Scriptures in a failed attempt to justify their abominable acts.

Their dealing with Leviticus is even more ridiculous.

"Leviticus 18:22

Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is an abomination. (KJV)

Leviticus 20:13

If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. (KJV)

Leviticus is outdated as a moral code, but we still picked it as our most important book to address in our edits, as most anti-LGBT religious activists cite Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 as proof-positive that homosexuality is a sin, even worse, a sin punishable by death.

Translation of the Word Abomination

To address Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, we need to look at the path of translation. The Hebrew word “to’evah” from which abomination is translated simply means something that is “ritually unclean,” or a “taboo.”

Given the definition of the Hebrew word “to’evah” and the other “to’evah”s in Leviticus, we suggest that by today’s standards, a biblical abomination would be understood to be “scandalous.” (Keep in mind, a biblical “abomination,” by Levitical standards, would be scandalous, for a Jewish priest. Leviticus a holiness code for Jewish priests; In Hebrew it is known as Torat Kohanim – “Instructions for the priests”.)

Next on the path of translation, we see that the pre-KJV Greek versions of Leviticus could have used the Hebrew word “zimah” or Greek “anomia” – words that mean “actual violation of law or a sin,” but notably did not use those words. Anomia was used in pre-KJV Greek translations in the case of child sacrifice, a popular pagan ritual.

To simply replace “abomination” with “taboo” would only address 18:22, and not the death penalty proposed in 20:13. Furthermore, we don’t believe homosexual relations to be taboo, so that solution would have been unsatisfactory. Since abominable offenses aren’t all punishable by death like this one leads us to believe there was translative error at some point: If having sex with a man is punishable by death, it wouldn’t be called an abomination. Therefore, we left the word abomination as is, and found a much more elegant and logically clear solution to this interpretive ambiguity…

Context Within Leviticus

Leviticus is a very strict holy code designed to prevent acts associated with pre-Jewish idol worship. Many of the rules concern sexual acts, as most pagan rituals were sexual in nature. One notable and highly condemnable act was having sex with male pagan temple prostitutes. Both Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 are often referenced by themselves, but to understand the meaning behind the most famous anti-LGBT Bible verses, we looked at their context within Leviticus.

Leviticus 18 includes a long list of forbidden sexual offenses in the form of incest, from verse 6 (“near of kin” relatives) to verse 18 (your wife’s sister). At verse 19, the sexual offenses are no longer incestuous, simply forbidding sex with a menstruating woman (verse 19) and your neighbor’s wife (verse 20).

Leviticus 18:20 switches to the important topic of pagan idolatry: “And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD.” Again we must leverage the historical context in which Leviticus was written: Molech is an ancient pagan god, often referred to as “the [the] false god.” Leviticus mentions Molech in several places. Archetypal pagan rituals for worship of Molech included child sacrifice (literally referenced here in verse 20, and which we know was a “zimah,” punishable by death), as well as sex with male temple prostitutes. In fact, having sex with these male prostitutes in a pagan temple was the most popular form of Molech worship and therefore of “abominable” pagan idolatry.

We assert that Leviticus 18:21 refers to “lying” with these pagan male prostitutes as a form of pagan idolatry. This fits in with the story order of Leviticus."

Except, the point is that no where does it state for a man not to lay with a pagan prostitute. It states that men are not to lie with men! I'm wondering why these people didn't attempt to alter Adam and Eve. Why didn't they introduce a homosexual couple? Oh that's right, because they would then have been only those two people and no more, unable to fulfill the command to be fruitful and multiply. In addition they would really have hurdles to climb in dealing with Jesus' words regarding marriage as being between a woman and a man and that for life from the beginning, according to Matthew 19.

Friends, there are many examples at the publisher's site where they completely distort the Scriptures. The apostle Paul spoke correctly about such people when he said, "And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind." It's not that they don't claim a god, it's that they do not honor the true God as God and so God gives them over to a reprobate, or "unfit," mind.

May God have mercy upon them, for he certainly did not show mercy to Sodom when they engaged in such wicked acts.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.






  • Pheonix_Dragon

    Why do Christians always seem to find objections to passages in the Bible, which come from the Old Testament? Does any one not realize, that the Old Testament is the Bible of the Hebrews, prior to the birth of Jesus? And that the New Testament refers to those "born into the body of Christ'! I have problems with Christians who claim to have knowledge of the distortions of the Bible, by the LGBT community, who are also guilty of quoting passages in the Old Testament, to fit their views of how Christians should live, according to the New Testament. Get it straight, all you so-called Christians. The Old Testament is for pre-Christian Jews. The New Testament is for Christians. Together, both parts make up the complete Bible, but to follow the teaching of the Book, as a whole, and you are a Christian, makes your religion suspect. Therefore, if you are, (and claim to be a Christian); shouldn't you be reading the New Testament, and following the tenets to be found there-in; while keeping the tenets from the Old Testament, off to one side, since those tenets often do not fit in with the tenets of the New Testament?
    Personally, while I do believe in a higher power, I don't label it as "God". I also do not believe that there is a "Hell", nor do I believe that there is a "Devil". To me, those concepts are from the Jews, and Christians, who are of the same type of faith, in which the only way to their concept of "Heaven", is through following the tenets of their religion; (ie: Worshiping their God, to the exclusion of all other gods). This is the same belief system which the followers of Islam use.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003457282985 Mike Slaney

    What did you expect, if some one disagrees with GOD, eradicate his spokesmen, change the view of GOD, and rewrite HIS WORD, the GOD haters have been doing that for centuries. The sins of the Sodomites and Gomorrahites are no different, they do what their father tells them to do. Just like those whose lifestyle are committing adultery, idolatry, murder, theft, fornication, (politician, oops, not on the list) and alike they do what their father tells them too. Only Christ can break their sin and chains of enslavement, Truly!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Will-Thompson/1362563287 Will Thompson

    What gets me in the quest to justify same-sex behavior is the lack of emphasis on the "newness of life" that Christ brings. Christ brings a transformation according to His teachings as well as His Apostles. And those who "Christ accepts," i.e. who were once marginalized should not be the same once having an encounter with Chrst. If sinners who Jesus came to save are changed, does not this include those involved is same-sex relationships? And that their previous behavior, i.e. past life of sin should be left at the feet of Jesus who came to save? It seems to me this community does not want to at all leave their behavior, but justify it from a Biblical basis. Go figure their schizophrenia. They do not want people using the Bible to disagree with their behavior while at the same time reinterpreting the Scripture to justify it!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Barney/100000502045724 Victor Barney

    It ALSO is written that ABSOLUTELY NOTHING CAN BE DONE WITHOUT OUR HEBREW-INSPIRED CREATOR'S APPROVAL! WATCH!

  • Dennis

    I literally would laugh myself to death over this except its not a laughing matter.How ignorant can people be? Just what depths will they sink to make their sin not sin? The word of YAHWEH(GOD) is so clear on this issue it astounds me that people cant see it.Whats next? Rewriting the scriptures to make child molesting ok? bestiality? it could go on and on and then we wonder why school shootings happen? We are so far from YAHWEH(GOD) and have turned so far from his face ,its only through his love that we havnt been wiped out all ready.This sickens me to no end.

  • vietnamvet1971

    With a Reprobate Twisted Mind, what else can they do but Twist and degrade the word of GOD to suit their EVIL Lifestyle. GOD says it is a SIN and talks about the Sexual SIN is one against ones own Body. The Sexual Sinner who does NOT Repent will not enter GOD'S Kingdom according to GOD.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Barney/100000502045724 Victor Barney

      Just thought that i would add a comment here revelant also to the "above" comment! Yes, "YAHWEH," is our HEBREW "ELOHIM"(NOT GOD) BY NAME, AS "YAHSHUA," MEANING THAT "YAHWEH MEANS SALVATION" IS HIS SON & GOD(GAWD) IS THE BABYLON DEITY OF "GOOD LUCK," SO PLEASE ALSO DON'T GO THERE EITHER! Again, just saying what's written from a fellow vietnamvet1736...

  • sscannell05

    No more amazon for me, ever!!!!!!

  • brwhit

    Well, the Bible states that anyone who changes the Word of God shall be damned, so I guess a whole boatload of pudding packers are going to be tormented in Hell for Eternity. I have no problem with that, all "Normal" humans can do is pray for them.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Barney/100000502045724 Victor Barney

      It ALSO IS WRITTEN THAT WE ARE "NOT" EVEN TO PRAY FOR THEM! IN FACT, DON'T EVEN MENTION THEIR NAME(EXODUS 23:13). Note: Also understand that it also is written that "Judah" will be calling itself "ISRAEL," a name given to Joseph's seed(Gen. 28:16) & PROVEN BY BY NOW MARXIST ENGLAND, not Judah's seed, ONLY PROMISED "MESSIAH"(Gen. 49:10)! We, as ENGLAND, LOST "NAME IDENTITY" BY BREAKING THE "SABBATHS COVENANT" THAT WENT WITH THE "NAME" ISRAEL! I dIdn'T WRITE THAT, AND IT ISN'T AT ALL DIFFICULT TO COMPREHEND, IS IT? ALSO KNOW: "HEBREW" IN THE ONLY SPIRITUALLY INSPIRED LANGUAGE(ZEPH. 3:9, ACTS 26:14, 1 COR. 4:6) & THAT "JESUS" ADDED BY RCC'S CHURCH PHILOSOPHER PETRUS GALATINUS IN THE 1300's WAS DONE TO HONOR "GREECE" ONLY BECAUSE IT ALWAYS WAS "ROMAN TRADITION" TO HONOR THE HIGHEST DEITIES OF THOSE COUNTRIES THAT THEY HAD DEFEATED, GREECE GIVEN THEM "ZEUS" TO HONOR! LOOK UP PETRUS GALATINUS & HE'LL TELL "YOU" HIMSELF & HE SHOULD KNOW, DON'T YOU THINK? OUR GIVEN 6,000 YEARS IS ABOUT OVER FOLKS, SO "TIME" IS GETTING CLOSE TO RUNNING-OUT FOR MAN'S GIVEN AGE!

  • Dalog

    I went to the publishers web site and read his excuse, I mean explanation of the reasoning behind the changes. I found it fascinating that in most cases he cites the fact that in that time, homosexuality was common, at least it was common as a major part of the Paganism rampant in the world of that day.

    He goes on to speculate that the Bible was ONLY condemning the homosexuality being practiced by Pagan worshipers, BUT it was acceptable as long as it wasn't part of those practices.

    I find this to be quite a stretch in reasoning.

    • Erom Nodd

      It is quite a stretch. God left no "out" whatsoever anywhere in His Word, so the liberals (communists, really) finally took the final step...instead of denying and playing the "Did God really say..." game, they change it to suit themselves.

      The Lake of Fire awaits such as these.

    • Robert

      In reply to the altered Scripture, I can only think of the explanations of Scripture provided in Chapter 16 of The Owner's Manual, precepts (601) and (602):

      "In it’s grossest incarnation, this religion [the Babylonian mystery religion] became what was being practiced in Canaan. The behaviors it fostered, and their consequences, were listed in one of the nastiest passages in the Bible, a passage that explicitly told the Israelites not to do what the Canaanites were doing: Adultery. “You shall not lie carnally with your neighbor’s wife, to defile yourself with her.” Human sacrifice—of one’s own children. “And you shall not let any of your descendants pass through the fire to Molech.” Blasphemy. “Nor shall you profane the name of your God: I am Yahweh.” Homosexuality. “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.” Notice that Yahweh calls it an abomination—the strongest epithet in Scripture. Finally there’s bestiality. “Nor shall you mate with any animal, to defile yourself with it. Nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it. It is perversion....” I can’t even believe there’s a word for it."

  • http://twitter.com/LDommel Linda Dommel

    Just like the US Gov't re-wrote history books on the blacks

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Barney/100000502045724 Victor Barney

      SATAN DEMANDED IT TO PRODUCE HIS PROMISED ENDTIME "ANTI-CHRIST"(MARXIST) OVER U.S. NO? WATCH, AND IT WILL SOON BE MADE EVIDENT!!! Also remember that it also is written that the first(Cain) will be "LAST" and the Last, ABLE, murdered by CAIN, will be "FIRST" TO BECOME RESURRECTED! PLEASE THINK ABOUT THAT, BECAUSE "I" DIDN'T WRITE IT?

  • Farmdog

    Since one is held responsible for adding to or taking away from the scripture, these people are in a lot of trouble.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Barney/100000502045724 Victor Barney

      FYI: 2 Peter 1:20 CLEARLY STATES HOW TO READ SCRIPTURE, i.e. "ONLY" THROUGH THE USE OF SCIENTIFIC "DEDUCTION," NOT INDUCTION, OR "WE THINK"...

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/A5XATL2D3WV4HZQPBYIKB4LMUI RON ALFORD

    God tells us very plainly in His Holy Word that if anyone changes one dot or one tittle he is in danger of eternal damnation.

  • Sunrise2

    If Amazon continues to push this perverted version of the Bible, I will no longer shop at Amazon.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Barney/100000502045724 Victor Barney

      I ALREADY DON'T & STILL WON'T! Just saying...

  • http://www.facebook.com/barbjeanpatton Barb Patton

    Mankind seems to have forgotten that God is someone that is not to be played with -- He allows us to know and recognize right from wrong. Now, in 2012 we have become so sex crazed and sinfull that god will punish ALL of us for the sins of the wicked

  • Sunrise2

    Hate to say it, but the KJV was out way before 1946 and mine has plenty to say about the "crimes against nature." QJV is the ultimate Satanic, perverted version of Gods Word. They can try to justify their abominations all they want. "It is appointed once unto men to die, and after that the judgement." Good luck perverts. You going to need it.

    I wonder if these perverts are going to change the wording of Natural Law too to condone thier actions? "Crimes against nature" that should be but are not inforced today?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Matthew-Ribarich/100002115280798 Matthew Ribarich

    King James of the King James version of the Bible is buried in England next to his gay lover. King James was bi-Sexual.

    • Sunrise2

      King James only commissioned the Bible to be printed. Where do you get that garbage that King James was bi?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Barney/100000502045724 Victor Barney

      I understand that it was a "QUEEN" that wrote the King James, not a KING! Just saying...

  • mathis1689

    Apparently these fools don't believe that God is capable of choosing the words that He wants to use. They also must not believe that Revelation 22:18-19 don't mean anything either.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-Barney/100000502045724 Victor Barney

      Again, that's JUST HOW WE GOT "GOD"(GAWD) THE BABYLONIAN DEITY OF GOOD LUCK & "JESUS" TO HONOR "ZEUS" BY RCC CHURCH "PHILOSOPHER," PETRUS GALATINUS BECAUSE IT ALWAYS WAS "ROMAN TRADITION" TO GIVE "HONOR" TO THE HIGHEST DEITIES OF ALL COUNTRIES THAT IT CONQUERED IN WAR, GREECE DOING THE TRICK FOR PETRUS IN THE 1300's!

  • Randy K

    "As the days of Noah were, so also shall the coming of the Son of Man be."

    • Sunrise2

      Yep, wer are living in those days. Look at all the legalizing of "gay" marriage by some states and legalizing drugs, etc. Feel sorry for people with kids these days.