John Emmert, a NASA scientist working at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington D.C. studying the earth's upper atmosphere has reported that an increased level of CO2 in the outer atmosphere is causing less gravitational pull on satellites and space trash. Of course, the main nucleus of the report is about increased CO2 levels generated by humans and resulting global warming/climate change, rather than the aspect of gravity itself.

John Emmert is yet another scientist in a long list of individuals studying GW/CC who are highly educated in fields having nothing to do with weather, climate, or general atmospheric physics. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, World Meteorological Organization, WMO, and other United Nations based climate research organizations are for the most part, void of meteorologists and instead employ a variety of PhDs and scientists who have no formal education in any subject having to do with weather and climate. Some of these so called climate experts are not scientists’ at all but simply environmental activists. It is safe to say that the whole GW/CC genre is unreliable junk science, since it is operated by individuals considered pseudo climate scientists.

The entire GW/CC ideal should insult those who are actual meteorologists since it doesn't include those who are truly experts in the field of weather and climate and have the formal education making them so.

No one would consider seeking medical advice from their plumber or legal help from a physician yet, that is what we are doing when we believe what we are told concerning GW/CC. The concept of GW/CC is based on nothing more than forecasts made by corrupted computer models and manipulated data designed to show a particular outcome presented by those unqualified to assess atmospheric physics. Realistically, climactic facts and actual weather records do not support the fantasy at all.

Claims of the decade from 2000 to 2010 being the hottest on record, the hottest year on record recently (no specific year since they couldn't seem to agree on an exact year) both had to be revised since actual records proved otherwise. Every wild claim made by the GW/CC pseudo scientists has been proven false.

The idea that CO2 levels have risen to the point that it will affect the world's climate is absurd. The actual percentage of CO2 in the whole atmosphere is less than 1% of 1% meaning that at this level on concentration it is an inert gas at best which simply isn't enough to change anything at all, much less than cause global scale climate changes.

The claim that increased CO2 levels can decrease gravitational pull on objects in space is a farce, because the force of gravity is determined by the size and density of an object such as planets and moons themselves rather than the type of atmosphere surrounding them. For instance, a space as tall as the Empire State Building could be filled with pure CO2, a second space the same size could be filled with air and a ball dropped at the same time from the top of both of them would land at the bottom at identical times. The same experiment could be done on the planet Mars using air from earth to fill one space and the Martian atmosphere which is over 90% CO2 to fill the other and the results of having the balls land at the bottom at the same time would be the outcome. The point being that the balls would fall according to the gravitational pull of the planets themselves and not due to the content of the atmosphere itself.

Another CO2 lie is about the duration the gas stays in the atmosphere. According to the IPCC it will remain in the atmosphere anywhere from 100 years to as much as 500 years. However, the actual scientific fact is CO2 will only stay in the atmosphere from 3 to 5 years.
In actuality, with the need for higher crop yields and quality with the rising human population an increase in CO2 levels would be just what we need instead of genetically manipulating crops which can have profound health consequences as we now have.

Those who promote the myth of GW/CC aren't interested in fighting climate change at all but have a political agenda they wish to enact which was fully explained in the UNs Agenda 21. The only way they can achieve it is by creating a global threat that must be confronted using guide lines from the Agenda itself. Thus, we are being fooled into fighting a nonexistent threat in the form of GW/CC which requires us to submit to their vision of a New World Order.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

Print pagePDF pageEmail page



  • cpass

    Thank you, Tony, for this post! All on point. Below a commenter is lamenting the indoctrination of our children with the dangerous rubbish. That truly is the very worst of the entire scheme....putting these lies in the heads of America's children. Criminal and tragic. That is where we need to go...stop that completely. Also, the commenters below discussing Agenda 21 and the UN are correct. But will the U.S. get out of there or kick them out of here? Praying and hoping that we will see that day, but not likely. Anyway...keep after it! Good going!

  • Disgusted!

    Funny the ones that are experienced in weather say it is absurd as well. Everyone needs to stop listening to people like Al Gore. My god he said Obama lost his 1st debate due to altitude!!!!!!! Do not let these people that are for killing people so they can have a "sustainable" population fool you so easy. They are making a BUNCH of money from this lie too which leads me to believe they probably really do have things like THE CURE FOR CANCER! The rules and lies follow the money and it CAN be tracked!

  • Theodore

    It pathetic how the climate change proponents usually trot out the usual suspects:
    Bill McKibben and James Hansen.

  • Blessings

    National Geographic, Nova, etc have had specials regarding this issue. It's just not true. The Earth is cyclical and it goes through these weather changes naturally. What we omit to the air and ground does make a difference, however not what is labeled Global Warming...PERIOD!

  • http://FarTooMuch.Info JRuss

    Mostly I agree. But there were several errors. CO2 is almost 4% of 1% of our atmosphere. If the pressure is the same, a ball dropped through CO2 will be slightly slower then through air. [CO2 has more drag then air.] Genetically modified crops use RoundUp that kills everything in the soil causing release of CO2 from the dying organisms. This does not happen with organic or non-GMO crops. CO2 has a very narrow absorption spectra. Does painting a yellow box with yellow paint make it any warmer? Water vapor, on the other hand, has a very wide absorption spectra. Its like comparing yellow with black. Note that the daily temperature variation in a Rain Forest is much less then in a desert. Over the last decade, the temperature of the antarctic has dropped. The temperature of the arctic has increased. Could this have anything to do with the three active underwater volcanoes North of Alaska? [This was a few years ago, so maybe they have become inactive.] These are just a few comments for your information.

  • David S. McQueen

    If it wasn't AGW/CC, it would be some other excuse to control our lives. Obama's Marxist ideology cannot stand on its merits (it has none), but there are obviously plenty of fools in the US and around the world that buy into the BS. Frankly, I was surprised that Obama won the election. When you look at a color-coded map, the vast majority of it DIDN'T vote for the Marxist: only the left coast and the northeast and the major cities.

  • Jerry Robison

    In science there is only the truth based on facts from proof. Many have stated that there is consensus among so-called "climate scientists" regarding anthropogenic climate change, aka. global warming, that makes it fact. This conclusion, based on consensus, has not been proven through the scientific method. The rise in CO2 in the atmosphere is coincidental but not demonstrably causing climate change. Consensus by supposed experts must be suspect because any conclusions reached by that method are likely false.

    "Consensus: The process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values, and policies in search of something in which no one believes, but to which no one objects; the process of avoiding the very issues that have to be solved, merely because you cannot get agreement on the way ahead. What great cause would have been fought and won under the banner: 'I stand for consensus?' "
    ― Margaret Thatcher

  • freedomgirl

    I'm Happy to see all are looking up 'Agenda21'!!!
    HAAAA.... Happy and Agenda21 shouldn't be in 1 sentence...!!!
    God Bless Our Children!!!
    God Bless America!!!
    God Bless Our Existance!!!

  • gnafuasusual

    Yep, 2+2=5 / Newspeak / George Orwell "1984" / Sustainable Development is Agenda-21 and that all = Global Warming!! (Newspeak - political mumbo jumbo) What will happen when only one single "leader" is left on planet Earth? No people to push around and no one to make the food he would eat...Nothing is a lonely place.

  • ARMYOF69

    Throw the UN out of our country, with its members inside it. Lock the doors first then blow it up.

  • stonemike

    We will kill UN aggressors, bring them on , if they are that stupid! Americans will get mean pretty quick, just keep playing "the dictator" big ears, we will not take UN prisoners and we owe aggressors any clemency!

    • Corrine

      We need to nip this is the bud. We need to do what was done in 1776 !!!!!

    • fliteking

      Excellent point.

    • stonemike

      Please stay active Corrine, our nation is under seige and our so-called leader is the ENEMY!

  • MontanaMEL

    Dang FliteKing...thought you would have caught it...

    LAST WEEK, the "Met Office" in the UK issued a full report on 3,000 different reporting points, i.e, weather stations; scattered around the world...and, this was a full listing of all their data points since way back, like into the 60's I think it was...

    BOTTOM LINE... For the past 16 years, including up until "mid 2012"....the trend line is FLAT LINE for the earths' temp!... That means that there is NO measurable change, warm or cold, whatsoever!!...

    Seems their last report, valid "up thru" sometime in 2010 showed some minor "up tic" or increase...but, the past 2 years worth of data has wipped that "trend or tic" fully out !!..

    Typical with this bunch of liers....claim from the FACTS !!.

    Source: MAIL ONLINE...UK.

    • freedomgirl

      The Children are being Brainwashed!!
      The Schools are 'teaching' these young Children our World Is Eroding, Polluted and in Extinction!!!
      They need to Save it!!! That's The Hoax~~~!!!
      Hitler Youth/Obama youth in a huger scale than ever imagined!!!!
      UN Agenda21... Killing the People/Saving the Earth!!!

    • freedomgirl

      Proofreading doesn't matter today!!!
      The Point Is The Matter..

  • billl77

    its time to round up these peeps. these are crimes againt humanity. put them through the wood chipper I say bbbbrrrrrroooowwwww fargo anyone?

  • ProtectAmericaNow

    I recommend looking up Agenda 21 to see what the UN and our corrupt government is working towards.

  • Greg

    Screw the UN. Blue helmets make great targets!!

  • retiredmillwright

    Control of our government has rapidly slipped from the tax
    payers hands to the socialists. Their supporters make huge money out of frightening
    people with lies and misinformation about climate change and global warming.
    What the American people should really be scared of is our out of control
    socialists that are cramming their lies down the tax payer’s throats and using
    their partners in crime, the UN to help do so. The UN is a corrupt anti
    American origination. Their member’s
    hate freedom and seek to extort money and power from the American people any
    way possible, including the global warming scam. The socialists running our
    government go along with the UN, like the partners in crime they are.

  • fliteking

    The terms "'Climate Change" *** or "Global warming" are both little more than assinine political jokes to the well informed.

    Even after "ClimateGate" where hundreds of emails outlining the fraud used by the UN to "prove" their case for "Climate Change" were hacked and released to the whole world, the less than stellar IQ of the liberals could comprehend they were being duped.

    So for our liberal "friends" who truly border on the ignorant, here is a very informative link: (Democrats: Sound out the bigger words or use text to voice software)

    *** And just a thought, why would Liberals care about "Climate Change" ? It can't be for their kids and future generations - - - because they either abort their kids or saddle them with a financial burden that can never be overcome through their crooked and immoral political agenda - - - so why DO liberals care about "Climate Change" ?

    • vet

      Good point!!!

    • fliteking

      Thanks Vet! And thanks for your service.

      USCG 1980-84 search and rescue north atlantic.

    • Les

      Actually it has a lot to do with dollars lining pockets at our expense. Just look at Gore who has been cashing in on Global Warming from the start. And he's not alone, look how much of our morning went for all those bankrupt "green" efforts.

  • fliteking

    Obama has made it clear this will be a priority for his Administration over the next four year's, and he has already reached out to the UN for assistance.

    Of course, most liberals will gladly line up on their knees in front of the zipper that feeds them.