PA Judge Blocks Voter ID Law Just Days Before Election


A Pennsylvania judge has blocked the enforcement of a Pennsylvania Voet ID law. this comes just 35 days before the November 6 elections.

Fox News reports,

A Pennsylvania judge on Tuesday blocked the state from enforcing its strict voter ID law before the presidential election, citing "disenfranchisement" concerns. The ruling in a vital battleground state comes five weeks before the election.

The ruling, which could still be appealed, followed two days of testimony about the state's efforts to make it easier to get a valid photo ID, as well as possible hurdles for those seeking proper identification.

The challenge to the six-month-old law is one of several across the country to laws -- largely backed by Republican legislators -- requiring voters to show photo identification.

Keep on top of the Pennsylvania state races on FoxNews.com

Republicans say the laws are necessary to prevent election fraud. But Democrats, who in Pennsylvania joined up with the AARP and NAACP in opposition, claim residents could be blocked from exercising their right to vote.

Judge Robert Simpson said, in his opinion Tuesday, he anticipates that by Election Day, "the gap between the photo IDs issued and the estimated need will not be closed."

He added: "Consequently, I am not still convinced in my predictive judgment that there will be no voter disenfranchisement arising out of the Commonwealth's implementation of a voter identification requirement for purposes of the upcoming election."

The NAACP seems pretty happy about the ruling. They released the following statements today:

Benjamin Todd Jealous, President & CEO of the NAACP:

“Today’s ruling is a victory for the Pennsylvania voter. On November 6, voters will no longer need to produce an identification to ensure that their vote is counted. As we look towards 2013, the Pennsylvania NAACP will take this battle from the courts to the legislature. We are confident that this state will not tolerate voter suppression.”

Jerome Mondesire, President of the NAACP Pennsylvania State Conference:

“The ruling today is encouraging for all Pennsylvanians. Unfortunately, it is a decision that should have been made a long time ago. With 35 days left until Election Day, the state must work with the NAACP and other leading organizations to limit voter confusion. We will work to ensure that poll workers do not wrongly enforce the law, and that all counties are monitored on Election Day."

Voter ID laws are attempts to make sure that the person voting is who they claim to be. While the NAACP and the Obama DOJ have constantly said it is an attempt to keep minorities and poor people from voting, that has yet to be proven. What it is designed to do is make sure that no one cheats when election day comes around.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.






Comments

comments

  • Florida

    Well Pennsylvanians mark down his name and in his reelection vote NOT to retain him!!!! We need to rid our country of radicals who do not protect the Constitution etc. This law is too disenfranchise Illegal Invaders and frauds! Those are the very people the Dem. need to keep them in power, just look at the proof current amnesty w/o Congressional approval and from 2008, 2010 Minnesota, Nevada!

  • mjritter

    Does anyone here actually bother to read the courts decision or do they just blow smoke. The judge is not a communist nor is GE an "Obama puppet." This judge was following the direction of the PA Supreme Court's decision. The judge had originally ruled differently, the case was appealed to the PA Supreme Ct. The court is a conservative court. However, we are a nation of laws, and the Supreme Ct instructed the judge to reconsider his decision due to several factors. I suggest the ignorant here read the Supreme Ct's decision and their basis for it. The decision left the judge little room but to delay the enactment for the law, which is one of the most restrictive in the country. There are many elderly who do not travel, do not drive, who opened a bank acct (if they have one) well before I'd's were required. It's easy for most people to comply but there are many (though in the scheme of things) that do not have all the required info to get an ID. In some cases it would take weeks to get a certified copy of a birth certificate. Most people here only consider their own situation and think it applies to all. The justices understand it...