A Few Republicans Who Want To Tax You More Online


online-sales-taxThe “Marketplace Fairness Act” is picking up momentum in the U.S. Senate, but the bill has some serious questions by conservative and libertarians alike.

Both the state and federal governments have spending that is way too high and includes billions in waste. Americans continue to be unemployed at a high rate and taxes are about to be increased even more on the lower and middle class Americans due to implementations in Obamacare and the threat of the Democrats infamous Taxmageddon.

It’s one thing for Democrats to push more taxation. It’s quite another when members of a party that claims to be conservative start doing it.

“If Congress fails to authorize states to collect tax on remote sales, and electronic commerce continues to grow, we are implicitly blessing a situation where states will be forced to raise other taxes– such as income or property taxes– to offset the growing loss of sales tax revenue. We do not want this to happen,” said bill sponsor Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) on the Senate floor. “The Marketplace Fairness Act empowers states to make the decision themselves. If they choose to collect already existing sales taxes on all purchases regardless of where the sale was whether it was inline (sic) or in a store, they can. If they want to keep the things the way they are, the states can do that.”

Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) also claims this is about states’ rights. “The reason why this bill is inevitable and why I hope it will pass… is because it is a simple 11-page bill about a 2-word issue: States rights,” Alexander said recently. “That is why Governor Christie and Governor Daniels and Governor Bush and Congressman Pence and many Republicans and many conservatives are saying let’s pass it. Let’s get out of the way and let States make their own decisions, and then the States can decide from whom they want to collect their sales taxes.”

Who are some of the Republican governors and representatives backing increased online taxation? That list includes:

Governors Bentley (R-Ala.), Branstad (R-Iowa), Christie (R-N.J.), Daniels (R-Ind.), Haley (R- S.C.), Haslam (R-Tenn.), LePage (R-Maine), Sandoval (R-Nev.) and Snyder (R-Mich.), former Governors Haley Barbour (R-Miss.) and Jeb Bush (R-Fla.), Senators Alexander, Enzi, Blunt (R-Mo.), Boozman (R-Ark.) and Corker (R-Tenn.), and Representative Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.). Representative Mike Pence (R-Ind.)

While many of these people claim that by gaining more taxes from online sales will allow them to decrease other taxes, we all know that is not going to happen, especially in states like California.

Breitbart.com reports,

Meanwhile, in California, some business owners have already been required by state officials to report and pay sales tax on online purchases made through the likes of Amazon.

Given the Golden State’s overall approach to taxes and regulation, it seems plausible that when taxes are required to be collected and remitted by the retailer directly, other taxes will not be reduced commensurately– and so for those in very blue, very liberal states, skeptics say, an effective tax hike could apply.

Leaders like Jeb Bush, however, have argued that Marketplace Fairness should, in fact, be used as a method of providing a more stable, predictable revenue base that enables other taxes to be cut. As Bush wrote in a letter to Florida Gov. Rick Scott, “It seems to me there has to be a way to tax sales done online in the same way that sales are taxed in brick and mortar establishments. My guess is that there would be hundreds of millions of dollars that then could be used to reduce taxes to fulfill campaign promises.”

Well Governor Scott, it seems to me that you should quit looking to tax your people more and cut spending. The same goes for Jeb Bush. I agree it should be a state’s rights issue, but the problem in all of this is why are Republicans looking to tax at the state level at all? They are supposed to be the ones who are looking to decrease taxes, not switch them up and certainly not increase them. What they are contemplating will pretty much eliminate a huge business in America and that’s the online business because one of the great advantages to purchasing online, in many cases, is that those purchases are not taxed.

The mentality that government thinks they are entitled to a portion of everything everyone makes is the biggest part of the problem.



  • Zagros

    This “Internet fairness” is anything but that. It makes more sense to have taxes paid based on where the business is located than where the consumer is located. After all, if I travel to another state, I pay the other state’s sales tax, not my own sales tax. When, and if, my state decides that I can credit back the other state’s sales taxes (including REFUNDING THEM when they are higher), I might consider this to be an act of “fairness” but as it stands now, it isn’t fair at all.

  • No new taxes.

    Yes this is Republican hogwash. For 3 years we have only heard no new taxes. Ahem hypocrites.

  • JM

    I THINK IT’S TIME FOR ANOTHER ARMED REVOLUTION.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003947052630 Emmentaler Limburger

    “The Marketplace Fairness Act “. Isn’t that from Atlas Shrugged?

  • J J

    The government is too big and only getting bigger. Government if in every aspect of our lives. I feel like the next thing to come will be that they are going to come into my home and install cameras so they can watch everything I do. And they will want to control what and how much I cook and eat; they will want to control how much and where I spend my time on my computer; etc. Government needs to downsize massively and go back to the Constitutional requirements. Government needs to stop twisting or ignoring the Constitution to fit their personal, future goals. Americans need to be free to succeed or fail on their own. Get out of the way!!!!

  • Joe

    I, for one, am livid about online taxation. These pols can say anything they want, but the fact of the matter is that this is just one more thing for the American people to have to deal with.

  • WhiteFalcon

    The Constitution states that there shall be no import tax on commerce between the states. Putting a “sales tax” on interstate sales is in fact putting an import tax on those goods. Clearly this is unconstitutional.

  • u812

    Pretty much looks like a list of who’s who of the GOP progressive movement !

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001005765937 Charles Pool

    if you vote to tax ……… better look for a new job

  • Supporting Fairness

    I recognize the unfairness of requiring brick and mortar businesses to collect taxes while not having the same requirement for online sales, but it seems to me that any new sales tax for online sales should require an immediate reduction in the state sales tax rate so the fairness issue is resolved without an overall tax increase to residents of the state. Of course, the sales tax is the one tax collected from those who are paid under the table so maybe it should be increased along with a reduction in other taxes so again the same amount of taxes is collected but in a more fair manner.

    • Eric Houtz Sr.

      Are you for real? you sound Like Odumba

  • Brutespeed

    This could potentially put a lot of businesses out of business. Let say you have a small business in a state and you depend on internet sales to survive. Then your state decides to start collecting sales tax on out of state purchases. (This would be fine if every state had to do it, and the percentage from all 50 states was the same.) Suddenly your out of state sales plummet, as potential customers shop around to find businesses in states that do not charge for out of state sales tax.

  • TPM4

    in a way i agree because this sends a lot of business out of the country and american business looses even more as US business pays sales tax and online sales do not kind of unfair advantage to us business and a big advantage to online sales maybe we need to consider american businesses

  • Jstarusa

    If you have to pay on line taxes and also high shipping costs, then the product is no longer a bargain! Duh! Reality check here folks…

  • tod

    They won’t let you people know what I wrote on this Antichrist Nazi Rag ,but if you hurry and click on my Name you can till they find out !!!

  • boccagalupe

    If you will notice the “R” after their names. They aren’t rinos, they’re good republicans. which equate to BAD CONSERVATIVES. They want to keep spending money that isn’t available, and that makes them as feeble-minded as the kenyan-in-the-outhouse.